English fiction -- 20th century; Lancashire (England) -- Fiction
“I shall take time to answer it, Mr. Needham. I have acted with you in
the past and I have taken leave to doubt the wisdom of your actions and
I have on such occasions acted neither with you nor against you. This
time--”
“This time, there’s no chance of doubt.”
“But I do doubt, sir. I doubt whether a factory, controlled by a strong
hand, has anything to fear from Workmen’s Combinations.”
“Damn it, look at Blackburn!”
“You shall have my decision when it is ready. At this moment, I tell you
candidly I do not incline to join you.”
“But union is strength. They’ve combined. So must we.”
“We always have, in essentials. I promise you I will give this matter
every thought.”
Needham looked angry, and then a cunning slyness passed across his face.
“I’m satisfied with that,” he said. “Aye, I’m satisfied, though you may
tell me I’ve come a long road to be satisfied wi’ so little at the end
o’ it.” Reuben rose, bowing gravely. “I am glad to have satisfied you,
Mr. Needham,” he said, blandly ignoring the hint that an invitation to
dinner was the natural expectation of a traveled caller.
“Aye,” said Needham, “Aye.” He finished the bottle, since nothing more
substantial was forthcoming, and rose to go. “Then I’ll be hearing from
you?”
“Yes,” Reuben assured him. “I will see you to your horse.”
“Nay, you’ll not. They don’t breed my make of horse. I’ve a coach at
door, and extra strong, too.”
“Then I will see you to your coach.” Needham nodded to the silent
Edward, and went out with Reuben. There was no strategical issue between
Needham and Hepple-stall. Needham, when he spoke, used phrases taken
from the writings of manufacturers more literate than himself, and
so stated, by such a man, his point of view sounded preposterously
obscurantist. But it was, in essence, Reuben’s view also, with the
difference that Reuben looked on attempts to combat the principle of
Unionism as tactical error. The Combination Acts, he felt, had gone
for ever, and the common policy of the masters should not be in the
direction of reviving those Acts but of meeting the consequences of
their repeal.
He was, indeed, habitually averse from open association with his fellow
manufacturers because of his self-conscious social difference, and,
where such a man as Needham led, was apt to pick more holes in his
policy than were reasonable. It was quite likely in the present case
that he would come round to Needham’s view, but certainly he would not
hurry. The troubles at Blackburn were remote from him and he felt his
own factory was out of the danger zone, and that if he threw in his
weight with the Needham petition it would be altruistically, and perhaps
a waste of influence which could have found better employment. His
own people were showing no signs of restiveness, and he didn’t think
Unionism was making much headway amongst them. Reason and self-interest
seemed allied with his native individualism to resist Needham’s policy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account