Nearly the whole of these recommendations were combated by the officers of the Post-Office during their examination--and successfully so--though it is certainly remarkable that, in the face of their opinions, the great majority of the proposals have subsequently been carried out with unquestioned advantage to the service. It would be a weary business to relate the objections made, and the exceptions taken to each recommendation as it came up to be considered. Of course the _non possumus_ argument was frequently introduced. Colonel Maberly said it was an impossibility that there should be hourly deliveries in London. A post-office in every village was thought equally absurd. We need only add, that the labours of the Committee led to little practical result. They decided, by a majority of four, not to report any judgment on the matter. Though this result must have been eminently unsatisfactory to Mr. Hill, especially on account of their not having expressed themselves on his grievances, yet, by refusing to exonerate the Post-Office from the charges which he had brought against it, the Committee may be said to have found for the reformer. With regard to Mr. Hill's further suggestions, they refer to the evidence, and, "entertain no doubt that his propositions will receive the fullest consideration" from the Treasury and the Post-Office. So they did eventually, after some weary years of waiting. Fifty years before, Mr. Palmer, writing to Mr. Pitt, said, "I have had every possible opposition from the Office." Mr. Hill might truly have said the same. Thus it is that history repeats itself, and "the thing which hath been, it is that which shall be." FOOTNOTES: [101] _Post-Office Reform_, p. 26. [102] _Results of the New Postal Arrangements_, read before the Statistical Society of London, 1841. [103] Second Report, p. 365. [104] The reader of such books as Cowper's _Life and Letters_, and Moore's _Correspondence_, will find that the means of obtaining franks, or carriage for their manuscripts or proofs, gave the poets frequent uneasiness, and lost them much time. So with many needy literary men, in what Professor de Morgan somewhat absurdly calls the "Prerowlandian days." The Professor himself gives an instance of an author sending up some dry manuscripts to him, under cover to a member of Parliament, expressing a hope, we think, that the representative would feel some interest in the subject. [105] Laing's _Notes of a Traveller_. [106] _Fraser's Magazine_, September, 1862. [107] Mr. Joshua Leavitt. [108] Page 96. [109] Select Committee on Postage, 1843, p. 246. [110] Parliamentary Committee, _Third Report_, p. 64. [111] "The first result of the scheme amply vindicated the policy of the new system, but it required progressive and striking evidence to exhaust all opposition."--_Ency. Brit._ Eighth Edition. [112] Postmaster-General's _First Report_. [113] Select Committee on the Post-Office, 1843.