Here and There in LondonRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
General
Here and There in London
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
London (England) -- Description and travel
gentlemen, generally are) settle comfortably in life. And so endeth the
chapter.
If this imaginary sketch be not true, it is not far from the truth. A
Government situation is known to be a pleasant berth, and is jumped at as
a man would jump at a freehold estate or a lump of Californian gold. A
man who has any influence with the powers that be, or a younger son,
instead of trying a trade or profession, will often seek a Government
situation, trusting, with the income arising from it, he may live in town
almost in idleness—at any rate in comparative luxury and ease. By the
side of a Rothschild he may be poor, but really he is not so badly off,
after all. The life of a Government _employé_ is considered gentlemanly,
easy, and not under-paid. Hence the doors of those who have places to
dispose of are furiously besieged by an eager and avaricious mob. The
higher offices are equally greedily seized, and equally as preposterously
over-paid. During one of the recent examinations before the committee of
the House of Commons, a quondam ambassador had the coolness to inform the
committee that the reason why the American ambassadors managed to perform
their duties for less money than the English ones was, that they lived so
much more economically; as if economy were a crime, and a thing to be
shunned by any of the numerous representatives of John Bull: and one
celebrated ambassador does not see how diplomacy can be carried on at all
unless the money of the nation be lavished on banquets, such as even
Soyer might envy and admire.
This is the climax of absurdity; and the time has come for such absurdity
to be treated with merited contempt. The axe must be laid at the root of
the tree. A reduction of salaries commensurate with the increased
cheapness of living, and with the difficulties the tax-payers have in
meeting the tax-gatherers’ demands, must be made at once. It is childish
to suppose that such a man as Mr. Bancroft was less respected at Paris
than the Marquis of Normanby, or that Lord Cowley would less powerfully
represent England were his salary of £10,000 cut down to £2,000. A
thoughtful man can see, in the glitter and glare of gilded saloons,
filled with flunkies and worshippers of the golden calf, nothing very
creditable, or worthy of admiration. At the same time it must be
remembered that, if the nation has efficient service, it is not grudging
as regards expense.
PATERNOSTER ROW.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account