Hereward, the Last of the EnglishKingsley, Charles
History
Hereward, the Last of the English
Kingsley, Charles
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066 -- Fiction
“Why not? As you know well, we Vikings are all brothers, and all know
each other’s counsel, from ship to ship and port to port.”
Then the two young men looked each other in the face, and each saw that
the other was a man who would suit him.
“Skall to the Viking!” cried Robert, aping, as was his fancy, the Norse
rovers’ slang. “Will you come with me to Holland?”
“You must ask my young lord there,” and he pointed to Arnulf. “I am his
man now, by all laws of honor.”
A flush of jealousy passed over Robert’s face. He, haplessly for
himself, thought that he had a grievance.
The rights of primogeniture--_droits d’ainesse_--were not respected in
the family of the Baldwins as they should have been, had prudence and
common sense had their way.
No sacred or divine right is conferred by the fact of a man’s being the
first-born son. If Scripture be Scripture, the “Lord’s anointed”
was usually rather a younger son of talent and virtue; one born, not
according to the flesh, but according to the spirit, like David and
Solomon. And so it was in other realms besides Flanders during the
middle age. The father handed on the work--for ruling was hard work
in those days--to the son most able to do it. Therefore we can believe
Lambert of Aschaffenbourg when he says, that in Count Baldwin’s family
for many ages he who pleased his father most took his father’s name, and
was hereditary prince of all Flanders; while the other brothers led an
inglorious life of vassalage to him.
But we can conceive, likewise, that such a method would give rise to
intrigues, envyings, calumnies, murders, fratracidal civil wars, and
all the train of miseries which for some years after this history made
infamous the house of Baldwin, as they did many another noble house,
till they were stopped by the gradual adoption of the rational rule of
primogeniture.
So Robert, who might have been a daring and useful friend to his
brother, had he been forced to take for granted from birth that he was
nobody, and his brother everybody,--as do all younger sons of English
noblemen, to their infinite benefit,--held himself to be an injured man
for life, because his father called his first-born Baldwin, and promised
him the succession,--which indeed he had worthily deserved, according to
the laws of Mammon and this world, by bringing into the family such an
heiress as Richilda and such a dowry as Mons.
But Robert, who thought himself as good as his brother,--though he was
not such, save in valor,--nursed black envy in his heart. Hard it was
to him to hear his elder brother called Baldwin of Mons, when he himself
had not a foot of land of his own. Harder still to hear him called
Baldwin the Good, when he felt in himself no title whatsoever to that
epithet. Hardest of all to see a beautiful boy grow up, as heir both of
Flanders and of Hainault.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account