Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologistsDuncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
History
Heroes of science : $b Botanists, zoologists, and geologists
Duncan, P. Martin (Peter Martin)
Naturalists
It is a very unusual occurrence for a man to take up a new subject after
he is fifty years of age, and to become a master in it. But Lamarck did
this. It is true that his previous training as a botanist had prepared
him, and it is also true that his years of solitude and poverty had given
him a singularly placid and meditative mind, and this was strengthened
by his natural courage. Had Lamarck been a descriptive zoologist only,
he would have been great; but the very method which made him great
originated in some remarkable speculations which had hardly been
expressed, seriously, by any man before. Not only did he place the animal
kingdom with the lowest first, but he considered the will, instinct, and
apparent reason of animals, and classified them accordingly with those
which are apathetic, sensible, and intelligent. The idea of lowness of
organization or of structure and lowness of nervous power amongst the
simplest animals struck him to be of primary importance. Hitherto, quite
as many people believed that the highest and most intelligent animals
were created first, and that the lower ones had degenerated from them.
Lamarck conceived that nature, acting by law, commenced with the simplest
things, and that one species formed others, so that the present animals
and plants are the outcome of those of the past history of the earth. He
believed in incessant change in nature, and that when our knowledge is
complete the apparently well separated and defined species will be found
to be united by intermediate forms, and cease to be species.
Hitherto naturalists had considered kinds of animals and plants, or
species as they are more properly called, to have been specially created
as they are seen by us, and that they were unalterable and invariable. No
one with any great knowledge of animals and plants had speculated about
the origin of species, and the causes of the differences of kinds, or
had endeavoured to place all the great classes of the animal kingdom in
a series, maintaining that they were related by descent. Right or wrong
in his speculations, Lamarck made an epoch in zoology, by writing on
the philosophy of zoology, and dealing with the possible causes of the
different kinds of animals. He considered that during all the geological
ages, down to the present time, animals and plants had been exposed to
great changes in their external conditions; changes of climate, and of
physical geography had happened, and that whilst some species had become
extinct many had been changed, little by little, into others. Lamarck,
and M. Geoffrey St. Hilaire declared it to be their opinion that there
had been an uninterrupted succession in the animal kingdom, effected by
means of birth and offspring from parents, from the earliest ages of the
world to the present day, and that the ancient animals, whose remains
have been preserved in strata, however different, may nevertheless have
been the ancestors of those now in being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account