Highways of Canadian LiteratureLogan, J. D. (John Daniel)
History
Highways of Canadian Literature
Logan, J. D. (John Daniel)
Canadian literature -- History and criticism
In particular, Haliburton justifies his sentential structure on
psychological grounds. In _Wise Saws_ he says that he purposely designed
the structure and rhythms of his sentences so that their length and
abrupt translations would spur the mind to attention, and that he
employed a conversational style and dialogue to create interest and keep
the attention alive. He wished his works, since they had a utilitarian
end, to be read by all classes. He resolved to adapt the style of his
works to assuring their popularity—‘in the parlor and the kitchen.’ His
themes were discursive and therefore he resolved that the stylistic
treatment should be discursive. So Haliburton consciously employed a
style which, by novelty of dress, by being written in natural language
and illustrated with droll humor, and which by colloquial sentential
structure would, like ‘oral chat,’ sustain interest or excite attention,
and inevitably be read in the parlor and the kitchen. ‘Why is it,’ asks
Sam Slick in the _Wise Saws_, ‘if you _read_ a book to a man you set him
asleep? Just because it is a book and the language ain’t common. Why is
it if you _talk_ to him he will sit up all night with you? Just because
it’s talk, the language of natur’.’
Haliburton’s humoristic or utilitarian prose style is justified, as he
himself justified it, by its successful adaption of means to end. In his
‘Apologia’ he noted the ‘unprecedented circulation’ of his works on
‘both sides of the Atlantic.’ He wrote _The Clockmaker_ in a people’s
style for people’s ends, and the style, in his own view, admirably
succeeded. We must therefore hold that academic criticism which scores
Haliburton’s humoristic style on the ground that it is loose, prolix,
repetitious, digressive, vulgar, colloquial, that it is not ‘_fine_
style,’ commits the fallacy of irrelevant conclusion. In the writing of
humoristic, utilitarian, conversational style, precisely adapted to its
end, Haliburton was a master. But he was also, at least on occasion or
whenever he essayed fine style, as in his descriptive prose, especially
of Nature, an artist of first rank, worthy of a place beside Ruskin,
Stevenson, and Hardy.
As regards Haliburton’s aesthetic style we may instance as example of
graphic realism in ‘local color’ his description of the dress and
characteristics of an Acadian people (_Nature and Human Nature_) and of
a Low German people (_The Old Judge_). An example of his fine artistry
in painting social life is his idyllic picture of the home of Captain
Collingwood’s sister, Aunt Thankful (_Wise Saws_). As a picture of the
sweet and gracious social life in old colonial days, it is a
masterpiece. But for sheer pathos of ‘thoughts that lie too deep for
tears,’ Haliburton’s description of the Duke of Kent’s Lodge, against a
background of Nature (_The Clockmaker_, third series), is worthy of
Ruskin or Hardy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account