Hildreth's "Japan as It Was and Is": A Handbook of Old Japan, Volume 1 (of 2)Hildreth, Richard
History
Hildreth's "Japan as It Was and Is": A Handbook of Old Japan, Volume 1 (of 2)
Hildreth, Richard
Japan -- History
Yoshimune, i., 119, 120, 125, 127, 144, 145.
“Young Japan” (Black), ii., 345.
“Young Japan” (Scherer), ii., 344.
Zelandia, Fort, in Formosa, i., 262, 302.
_Zeni_, i., 372, 373; ii., 309.
Zipangu, i., 1, 3-6, 14.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Omitted in this edition.—EDR.
[2] Omitted in this edition.—EDR.
[3] The true distance is about five hundred miles; but, possibly, by
miles Marco Polo may have intended Chinese _li_, of which there are
nearly three in our mile.
[4] A name applied to part of China, south of the Hoang-ho, held by the
Sung Dynasty till A. D. 1276.—K. M.
[5] Marsden, the English translator and annotator of Marco Polo,
supposes that _Zaitun_ was the modern _Amoy_, and _Kinsai_ either
_Ningpo_ or _Chusan_. The Chinese annalists, on the other hand, seem
to make the expedition start from Corea, which is much more probable,
as that province is separated from Japan by a strait of only about a
hundred miles in breadth. It was by this Corean strait that, three
hundred years later, the Japanese retorted this invasion.
[6] Marsden remarks upon this date as evidently wrong. Indeed, it is
given quite differently in different early editions of the travels.
Marsden thinks it should be 1281. This is the date assigned to the
invasion by the Chinese books. The older Japanese annals place it in
1284. In the chapter of Marco Polo which follows the one above quoted,
and which is mainly devoted to the islands of southeastern Asia, he
seems to ascribe to the Japanese the custom of eating their prisoners
of war—a mistake which, as his English translator and commentator
observes, might easily arise from transferring to them what he had
heard of the savage inhabitants of some of the more southern islands.
The Mongol invasion took place in the fourth year of Kōan [A. D.
1281].—K. M.
[7] As this chronicle, which is the oldest Japanese history, is
stated to have been originally published A. D. 720, it must be from
a continuation of it that Siebold, or rather his assistant, Hoffman,
translates.
[A translation by W. G. Aston is published by the Japan Society,
London.—EDR.]
[8] This is the equivalent, it is to be supposed, of the Japanese date
mentioned in the chronicle.
[9] Hildreth is here too skeptical. All the events mentioned in the
text really took place between A. D. 1268 and 1281.—K. M.
[10] Galvano’s book in the translation, published by Hackluyt, in 1601,
may be found in the supplement to Hackluyt’s collection of voyages,
London, 1811. The original work was printed by the pious care of
Francis de Sousa Tauares, to whom Galvano left it, on his death-bed.
[11] See Appendix, Note D.
[12] A Portuguese coin, as corresponding to which in value the Spanish
translator of Pinto gives ducats, which, of silver, were about equal to
a dollar of our money.
[13] This Portuguese colony was of no long continuance. It was soon
broken up by the Chinese, as Pinto intimates, through the folly of the
Portuguese residents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account