Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2Eliot, Charles
Religion
Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2
Eliot, Charles
Asia -- Religion; Buddhism; Hinduism
The Bhagavad-gîtâ identifies Kṛishṇa with Vâsudeva and with Vishṇu
but does not mention Nârâyaṇa and from its general style I should
imagine the Nârâyaṇiya to be a later poem. If so, the evolution of
Bhâgavata theology will be that Kṛishṇa, a great hero in a tribe
lying outside the sphere of Brahmanism, is first identified with
Vâsudeva, the god of that tribe, and then both of them with Vishṇu.
At this stage the Bhagavad-gîtâ was composed. A later current of
speculation added Nârâyaṇa to the already complex figure, and a
still later one, not accepted by all sects, brought the pastoral and
amorous legends of Kṛishṇa. Thus the history of the Bhâgavatas
illustrates the Indian disposition to combine gods and to see in each
of them only an aspect of the one. But until a later period the types
of divinity known as Vishṇu and Śiva resisted combination. The
worshippers of Śiva have in all periods shown less inclination than
the Vishnuites to form distinct and separate bodies and the earliest
Śivaite sect of which we know anything, the Pâśupatas,[493] arose
slightly later than the Bhâgavatas.
5
Patañjali the grammarian (_c._ 150 B.C.) mentions devotees of
Śiva[494] and also images of Śiva and Skanda. There is thus no reason
to doubt that worshippers of Śiva were recognized as a sect from at
least 200 B.C. onwards. Further it seems probable that the founder or
an early teacher of the sect was an ascetic called Lakulin or
Lakulîśa, the club-bearer. The Vâyu Purâṇa[495] makes Śiva say that
he will enter an unowned corpse and become incarnate in this form at
Kâyârohana, which has been identified with Kârvân in Baroda. Now the
Vâyu is believed to be the oldest of the Purâṇas, and it is probable
that this Lakulin whom it mentions lived before rather than after our
era and was especially connected with the Pâśupata sect. This word is
derived from Paśupati, the Lord of cattle, an old title of Rudra
afterwards explained to mean the Lord of human souls. In the
Sâṅtiparvan[496] five systems of knowledge are mentioned. Sâṅkhya,
Yoga, the Vedas, Pâśupatam and Pâncarâtram, promulgated respectively
by Kapila, Hiraṇyagarbha, Apântaratamas, Śiva the Lord of spirits and
son of Brahmâ, and "The Lord (Bhagavân) himself." The author of these
verses, who evidently supported the Pâncarâtra, considered that these
five names represented the chief existing or permissible varieties of
religious thought. The omission of the Vedânta is remarkable but
perhaps it is included under Veda. Hence we may conclude that when
this passage was written (that is probably before 400 A.D. and perhaps
about the beginning of our era) there were two popular religions
ranking in public esteem with the philosophic and ritual doctrines of
the Brahmans. The Mahâbhârata contains a hymn[497] which praises Śiva
under 1008 names and is not without resemblance to the Bhagavad-gîtâ.
It contains a larger number of strange epithets, but Śiva is also
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account