Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2Eliot, Charles
Religion
Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2
Eliot, Charles
Asia -- Religion; Buddhism; Hinduism
There followed a period of scholasticism in which the body of doctrine
called the Śaiva Siddhânta was elaborated by four Âcâryas, namely
Mey-Kaṇḍa-Devar[548] (1223), Aruṇandi, Maraiñâna-Sambandhar and
Umâpati (1313). It will thus be seen that the foundation of Śivaite
philosophy in Tamil is later than Râmânuja and the first Vishnuite
movements, and perhaps it was influenced by them but the methodical
exposition of the Śaiva-Siddhântam[549] does not differ materially
from the more poetic utterances of the Tiruvaçagam. It recognizes the
three entities, the Lord, the soul and matter as separate, but it
shows a tendency (doubtless due to the influence of the Vedânta) both
to explain away the existence of matter and to identify the soul with
the Lord more closely than its original formulæ allow. Matter is
described as Mâyâ and is potentially contained in the Lord who
manifests it in the creative process which begins each kalpa. The Lord
is also said to be one with our souls and yet other. The soul is by
nature ignorant, in bondage to the illusion of Mâyâ and of Karma, but
by the grace of the Lord it attains to union (not identity) with him,
in which it sees that its actions are his actions.
In modern times Śaiva theology is represented among Dravidians by the
works of Śivañânar (1785) and his disciple Kachiyappar: also by the
poems of Râma-linga. Śivaism in Madras and other parts of southern
India is still a vigorous and progressive Church which does not
neglect European methods. Its principal organ is an interesting
magazine called Siddhanta-Dipika or the Light of Truth. In northern
India the Śivaites are less distinct as a body and have less
organization, but temples to Śiva are numerous and perhaps the
majority of Brahmans and ascetics regard him as their special deity
and read Śivaite rather than Vishnuite texts. But it is probably also
true that they are not sectarian in the same sense as the worshippers
of Kṛishṇa.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account