Differences of temperament between nations are commonly to be noticed;
for instance, in comparing the shy and grave Malays with the boisterous
Africans. It is an interesting but difficult problem how far such
differences are due to inherited race-character, and how far to such
social influences as education and custom, and to the conditions of
life being cheerful or depressing. Nor has it yet been determined how
far emotions are differently expressed by different races, so that
it is worth while to notice particularly if their smiling, laughing,
frowning, weeping, blushing, etc., differ perceptibly from ours. The
acuteness of the senses of sight, hearing and smell, among wild peoples
is often remarkable, but this subject is one on which many accounts have
been given which require sifting. The skill of savages in path-finding
and tracking depends in great measure on this being one of their most
necessary arts of life to which they are trained from childhood, as, in
an inferior degree, gipsies are with us. The native hunter or guide’s
methods of following the track of an animal, or finding his own way
home by slight signs, such as bent twigs, and keeping general direction
through the forest by the sky and the sheltered sides of the trees, are
very interesting, though when learnt they lose much of their marvellous
appearance. The testing of the mental powers of various races is an
interesting research, for which good opportunities now and then occur.
It is established that some races are inferior to others in volume and
complexity of brain, Australians and Africans being in this respect
below Europeans, and the question is to determine what differences
of mind may correspond. Setting aside the contemptuous notions of
uneducated Europeans as to the minds of “black-fellows” or “niggers,”
what is required is, to compare the capacity of two races under similar
circumstances. This is made difficult by the fact of different training.
For instance, it would not be fair to compare the European sportsman’s
skill in woodcraft and hunting with that of the native hunter, who
has done nothing else since childhood; while, on the other hand, the
European, who has always lived among civilised people, owes to his
education so much of his superior reasoning powers, that it is mostly
impossible to get his mind into comparison with a savage’s. One of the
best tests is the progress made by native and European children in
colonial or missionary schools, as to which it is commonly stated that
children of African or American tribes learn as fast as or faster than
European children up to about twelve, but then fall behind. Even here it
is evident that other causes besides mental power may be at work, among
them the discouragement of the native children when they become aware of
their social inferiority. The subject is one of great importance, both
scientifically and as bearing on practical government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account