3. The greater weight and size, as well as the greater prominence of the
brow-ridges and ridges at the back of the skull, serve to distinguish
the male _sex_, but in many cases the determination of sex is almost
impossible.
As regards _age_, skulls are conveniently described as immature, adult or
senile. Immature skulls lack the full complement of teeth or of sockets
for these, and a deep cleft is seen to cross the base of the skull about
an inch in front of the large hole (foramen magnum) for the spinal cord.
Upon the attainment of maturity this cleft is obliterated, by the fusion
of its margins. In senile crania, the sutural lines on the surface are
almost entirely obliterated, and the jaws are toothless and much reduced
in size and prominence.
4. The skull may be deformed. It is important to attempt to distinguish
_deformation_ produced during life (either artificially or otherwise)
from that determined by the weight of superincumbent soil after
interment. Artificial deformation is manifested in most cases by
flattening of the forehead, or of the back of the skull, or of both. But
posthumous deformation is quite irregular, the face is often involved as
well as the brain-case, there is often extreme flattening from side to
side, and the bones are usually fragile and tend to fall apart.
5. _Trephine-holes_, indicative of enterprise in operative surgery,
should be noted. The regularity of contour and the size of the hole
often gives the clue to its real nature. It must be remembered
that, in the process of exhumation, injuries closely resembling the
foregoing operative wounds may be received by skulls, and therefore
the circumstances of exhumation demand enquiry in this connection.
Some skulls are found to have been incised or engraved with decorative
patterns after death.
6. _Craniological descriptions_ deal with the appearances presented by
skulls in each of the five normal positions or aspects depicted in Fig. 1.
In the first view or aspect (Fig. 1, B) the general form of the skull
is shewn, and in proportions the cranial case may be either elongated
or rotund; or again, if elongated, it may be elliptical (with no great
difference in form between front and back), ovoid (when the hinder end is
the broader), or rhomboid (lozenge or diamond-shaped).
In Fig. 1, C, the profile line, and its modification by prominent
brow-ridges or jaws, claims attention. In Fig. 1, D, the general form
of the eye (orbital aperture) and nose (nasal aperture), as well as
the relative breadth of the face, are considered. Fig. 1, E, shows the
palate, and the number and forms of the teeth are studied from this
point of view. In Fig. 1, A, the form of the transverse cranial arc, and
any irregularities, such as flattening or the production of a keeled
(scaphoid) appearance, should be noted.
[Illustration: FIG. 1.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account