Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
The Cathedral of Orvieto will illustrate these remarks. Its design is
very simple. It consists of a parallelogram, from which three chapels
of equal size project, one at the east end, and one at the north and
south. The windows are small and narrow, the columns round, and the
roof displays none of that intricate groining we find in English
churches. The beauty of the interior depends on surface decoration,
on marble statues, woodwork, and fresco-paintings. Outside, there is
the same simplicity of design, the same elaborated local ornament.
The sides of the Cathedral are austere, their narrow windows cutting
horizontal lines of black and white marble. But the façade is a
triumph of decorative art. It is strictly what Fergusson has styled a
“frontispiece”; for it bears no relation whatever to the construction
of the building. Its three gables rise high above the aisles. Its
pinnacles and parapets and turrets are stuck on to look agreeable. It
is a screen such as might be completed or left unfinished at will by
the architect. Finished as it is, the façade of Orvieto is a wilderness
of beauties. Its pure white marble has been mellowed by time to a rich
golden hue, in which are set mosaics shining like gems or pictures of
enamel. A statue stands on every pinnacle; each pillar has a different
design; round some of them are woven wreaths of vine and ivy; acanthus
leaves curl over the capitals, making nests for singing-birds or
Cupids; the doorways are a labyrinth of intricate designs, in which
the utmost elegance of form is made more beautiful by incrustations
of precious agates and Alexandrine glasswork. On every square inch
of this wonderful façade have been lavished invention, skill, and
precious material. But its chief interest centres in the sculptures
executed by Giovanni and Andrea, sons and pupils of Nicola Pisano. The
names of these three men mark an era in the history of art. They first
rescued Italian sculpture from the grotesqueness of the Lombard and the
monotony of the Byzantine styles. Sculpture takes the lead of all the
arts. And Nicola Pisano, before Cimabue, before Duccio, even before
Dante, opened the gates of beauty, which for a thousand years had been
shut up and overgrown with weeds. As Dante invoked the influence of
Virgil when he began to write his mediæval poem, and made a heathen
bard his hierophant in Christian mysteries, just so did Nicola Pisano
draw inspiration from a Greek sarcophagus, which had been cast upon
the shore at Pisa. He studied the bas-relief of Phædra and Hippolytus,
which may still be seen upon the tomb of Countess Beatrice, in the
Campo Santo, and so learned by heart the beauty of its lines, and the
dignity expressed in its figures, that in all his subsequent works we
trace the elevated tranquillity of Greek sculpture. This imitation
never degenerated into servile copying; nor, on the other hand, did
Nicola attain the perfect grace of an Athenian artist. He remained a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account