Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
the prosaic task of trying to find out to what circumstances its
beauty is due, and why the name of Richard Poore is honoured among
lovers of good architecture with that of Christopher Wren, no other
Englishman being worthy to make a third. The chief points to be noted
about Salisbury are these. The effect does not in any way depend upon
ornamental details. This may be proved by two examples taken from the
building. The west front was greatly injured at different times, its
carving broken, and its figures defaced. The carving has been copied
and “restored,” and new figures have replaced the old. The front is
now neat and spick and span, but the general effect is in no wise
improved, but rather deteriorated, by having its antiquity destroyed.
It is the same with the chromatic decoration of the interior, and with
the “improvement” of the Chapter-house. The painting on the roof tends
to lower it; the gaudy, shiny aspect of the Chapter-house goes far to
spoil, if it could spoil, the exquisite design and subtle proportions.
[Illustration: SALISBURY CATHEDRAL, ENGLAND.]
Another point to be noticed is this: Salisbury does not owe its beauty
to size, nor yet altogether to the style in which it is built. This is
easily proved. The great French cathedral of Amiens exceeds Salisbury
in all its dimensions, and was built, allowing for the difference
between France and England, in the self-same style. Both are examples
of First Pointed, and Amiens is, according to Fergusson, at least
twice as large in its cubic contents. “The French church covers 71,000
square feet, the English only 55,000. The vault of the first is one
hundred and fifty-two feet in height, the latter only eighty-five.”
There is still a more remarkable difference between the central spires
of the two churches. That of Amiens rises to a height of 422 feet;
that of Salisbury, the tallest in England, only to 404. Yet the great
height of the roof at Amiens robs its spire of any preponderance it
might otherwise boast, and leaves the comparatively small steeple of
Salisbury a feature of grandeur and beauty only approached by the still
lower dome of St. Paul’s, which rises at its highest part, the cross,
to 365 feet above the ground level.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account