Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
to Bishop Poore and nine others were destroyed, portions being neatly
arranged as in a kind of museum “along the plinth between the series
of pillars on each side of the nave.” Two small porches, one at the
north end of the great transept, and the other on the south side, near
the Lady Chapel, “were considered as neither adding to the beauty, nor
to the convenience of the building. They were accordingly taken down.”
The “accordingly” is another happy expression. We might be reading a
report of Sir G. Scott, or Mr. Pearson, or Mr. Butterfield. Yet this
was written close on a hundred years ago. A very interesting series
of paintings, representing the months or the Zodiac, were on some of
the eastern bays of vaulting. They were highly admired, we are told, by
those “regard the mere antiquity of an object as a sufficient title to
admiration.” These are precisely the words used lately by an architect
about the north transept of Westminster Abbey. Wyatt promptly wiped
off the traces of these decorations, and “judiciously coloured the
arches and ribs of the choir like the original stone. As the Campanile
intercepted the most striking view of the structure it was taken down.”
When we enter by the west door the first view is hardly so striking as
the first view of the exterior. A closer examination and a comparison
with other cathedrals shows how far Salisbury is in advance of
everything else of its kind. The exquisite lightness and delicate
proportions of the steeple are equally apparent in the nave and its
aisles, the slender columns, the pointed arches, the light triforium,
the lancets of the clerestory, and the soaring vault. The same
“order,” as the classical architect would say, is practically carried
round the church. As we advance eastward, and reach the crossing
of the transepts, we observe the curious four centred buttressing
arches erected by Bishop Wayte, 1415, to increase the supports of the
tower. Similar precautions are seen in Canterbury, Hereford and Wells
Cathedrals. Under the tower is a brass plate in the pavement which
was placed here in 1737, and marks the fact that the spire inclines
twenty-two and a half inches to the south-west. This inclination,
which is perfectly visible on the outside, was first calculated by
Sir Christopher Wren, who put iron “bandages” round the masonry, and
made other repairs. No increase of the deflection has been observed
since his time, although the spire was struck by lightning in 1741. The
choir screen is by Skidmore. The organ is divided. Some ancient glass
may be seen in the triplet windows at the ends of the transepts. The
altar stood to the eastward of the second or choir transept, and some
parts of the old stalls are still to be seen, but almost everything
in this part of the church is new. The Audley chantry (1524), in the
latest style of Gothic, is on the north side. There are some remains
of the very curious and interesting if not unique iron chantry of Lord
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account