Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
History
Historic buildings : $b as seen and described by great writers
Architecture -- History; Art -- Study and teaching; Historic buildings
Respecting which you are to observe, that the first Christian churches
in the catacombs took the form of a blunt cross naturally; a square
chamber having a vaulted recess on each side; then the Byzantine
churches were structurally built in the form of an equal cross; while
the heraldic and other ornamental equal-armed crosses are partly signs
of glory and victory, partly of light, and divine spiritual presence.
But the Franciscans and Dominicans saw in the cross no sign of triumph,
but of trial. The wounds of their Master were to be their inheritance.
So their first aim was to make what image to the cross their church
might present, distinctly that of the actual instrument of death. And
they did this most effectually by using the form of the letter T, that
of the Furca or Gibbet,--not the sign of peace.
Also their churches were meant for use; not show, nor
self-glorification, nor town-glorification. They wanted places for
preaching, prayer, sacrifice, burial; and had no intention of showing
how high they could build towers, or how widely they could arch vaults.
Strong walls and the roof of a barn,--these your Franciscan asks
of his Arnolfo. These Arnolfo gives,--thoroughly and wisely built;
the successions of gable roof being a new device for strength much
practised in his day.
This stern humour did not last long. Arnolfo himself had other notions;
most of all, Nature and Heaven. Something else had to be taught about
Christ than that He was wounded to death. Nevertheless, look how grand
this stern form would be, restored to its simplicity. It is not the old
church which is in itself unimpressive. It is the old church defaced by
Vasari, by Michael Angelo, and by modern Florence. See those huge tombs
on your right hand and left, at the sides of the aisles, with their
alternate gable and round tops, and their paltriest of all sculpture,
trying to be grand by bigness, and pathetic by expense. Tear them
all down in your imagination; fancy the vast hall with its massive
pillars,--not painted calomel-pill colour, as now, but of their native
stone, with the rough true wood for roof,--and a people praying beneath
them, strong in abiding, and pure in life, as their rocks and olive
forests. That was Arnolfo’s Santa Croce. Nor did his work remain long
without grace.
That very line of chapels in which we found our St. Louis shows signs
of change in temper. They have no pent-house roofs, but true Gothic
vaults: we found our four square type of Franciscan Law on one of them.
It is probable, then, that these chapels may be later than the
rest--even in their stonework. In their decoration, they are so,
assuredly; belonging already to the time when the story of St. Francis
was becoming a passionate tradition, told and painted everywhere with
delight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account