Historic Sites of Lancashire and Cheshire: A Wayfarer's Notes in the Palatine Counties, Historical, Legendary, Genealogical, and Descriptive.Croston, James
History
Historic Sites of Lancashire and Cheshire: A Wayfarer's Notes in the Palatine Counties, Historical, Legendary, Genealogical, and Descriptive.
Croston, James
Cheshire (England); Lancashire (England)
It is very commonly asserted that he died in Paris of the wounds he had
received at Agincourt, but the statement can hardly be correct, for
six years after the battle was fought his name occurs as party to a
marriage settlement, and his death did not take place until 1422.
The wound he received at Agincourt did not incapacitate him from taking
part a few years later in a foray that arose out of some quarrel
between Sir Peter Dutton of Dutton, in Cheshire, and Sir William
Atherton of Atherton, in Lancashire, knight, the two having made
inroads on each other's possessions. The circumstance is related by Sir
Peter Leycester, who says that--
Great contention fell between Sir Peter Dutton and Sir William
Athurton, of Athurton, in Lancashire, insomuch that they made inroads
and invasions one upon the other; and the said Sir Piers Dutton
and his adherents, to wit, Sir Rafe Bostock of Bostock, Richard
Warburton of Budworth, Thomas Warburton of Halton, John Done of
Utkinton, junior, John Manley of Manley, Hugh Dutton of Halton,
the elder, William Leycester, of Nether-Tabley, Sir Peter Legh of
Clifton,[55] and John Carington of Carington, were all sued by Sir
William Athurton, for taking away forty of his oxen and forty cows,
out of his closes at Athurton, and for beating of his servants. But
the variance was composed between them by the award of John Duke of
Bedford, Earl of Richmond and Kendal, constable of England, and regent
of the kingdom in the absence of Henry the Fifth, dated 9 Aprilis 7
Hen. V. 1419, restitution being awarded on both sides: the horses and
saddles taken by Sir William to be restored to Sir Piers Dutton, and
the cattel taken by Sir Piers to be restored to the said Sir William.
Our ancestors, it is to be feared, were of a quarrelsome disposition,
and, much as we may boast of "the good old times," it must be confessed
that they lose much of their charm when from our modern standpoint we
begin to examine closely the lives and habits of those who figured
in them. There is no reason to suppose that Sir Peter Legh was more
disorderly than his neighbours, similar outrages to those committed on
Sir William Atherton's lands being then of common occurrence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account