Historical Record of the Second, or Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot: Containing an Account of the Formation of the Regiment in the Year 1661, and of Its Subsequent Services to 1837Cannon, Richard
History
Historical Record of the Second, or Queen's Royal Regiment of Foot: Containing an Account of the Formation of the Regiment in the Year 1661, and of Its Subsequent Services to 1837
Cannon, Richard
Great Britain. Army -- History; Great Britain. Army. Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)
The foregoing Statement shows, therefore, that, although the
_Third_ Colour so long remained in possession of the Queen's
Royal Regiment, after other Regiments had laid it aside, it had
been erroneously considered that this Regiment had a _peculiar
privilege_ of carrying _Three_ Stand of Colours.
To correct this error, and to maintain uniformity throughout the
Army, His Majesty has recently directed "that no Regiment shall,
under any circumstances whatever, display a Third Colour;" and the
following Letter, dated 14th August, 1835, has been addressed, by
His Majesty's Special Command, to Lieutenant-General the Right
Honourable Sir James Kempt, G.C.B., as Colonel of the Second, or
Queen's Royal Regiment, by the Adjutant-General of the Forces, dated
_Horse Guards, 14th August, 1835._
SIR,
By desire of the General Commanding in Chief, I have the honour to
make the following Communication to you, for your information and
guidance; viz.:
The 5th Foot having, at Malta, preferred a Claim to the distinction
of bearing a Third Stand of Colours, Major-General Sir Frederick
Ponsonby referred the Case for Lord Hill's consideration, and his
Lordship immediately submitted it to the King.
His Majesty at once disallowed this claim, and, at the same time,
inquired whether a similar claim had been made and admitted in the
case of any other Regiment.
Lord Hill mentioned the case of the Queen's Royal, and fully
explained the grounds upon which the distinction of a Third Stand
of Colours had, so recently, been conferred upon that Corps;
when His Majesty was pleased to decide, that no Regiment in His
Majesty's Service should be permitted to display a Third Colour,
under any circumstances whatsoever,--and to command that His
Majesty's said decision should be notified to you.
The King, however, expressed to Lord Hill His Majesty's earnest
hope that you, and the Queen's Royal collectively, would regard
this decision, not as a mark of His Majesty's forgetfulness of the
uniformly high character of the Regiment, but solely as a proof of
His Majesty's determination to establish uniformity in this (as in
every other) respect throughout the Army.
His Majesty was graciously pleased to observe, that it was
impossible for him to render more manifest the high estimation
in which he held the character of the Queen's Royal, than by
transferring an Officer of your reputation to the Colonelcy of it,
from that of one of the most gallant and distinguished Regiments in
the Service; viz., the 40th.
The King was further pleased to observe, that if it were wished
upon your part, and upon the part of the Queen's Royal, that the
Third Colour should be retained and preserved, His Majesty would
not insist upon its being actually withdrawn; but, in making that
observation, His Majesty expressly ordered, that on no account
should the Third Colour ever be displayed in the Ranks of the
Regiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account