History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economyWhitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
History
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy
Whitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
Economics -- Great Britain -- History; Labor theory of value -- Great Britain -- History
Cost and value may, in certain cases,
tend to make mutual adjustments, but these are effected only by means of
changes in supply. Value is not determined by cost _per se_, or, that is
to say, cost is by no means of its essence. In the ordinary case, if one
capital is employed for a longer time than another, the outwardly active
process of production is continued for a longer time. If extra profit
accrues through a time when labor works and wheels turn, it is easy to
say that profits must be paid, and therefore the value of the product
must be of such and such an extent. But in an instance where the value
increases without the whirl of wheels and the manipulation of tools, the
phenomenon naturally presents itself to the mind in an unfamiliar aspect.
The wine merchant remains passive, and it seems plain that instead of
his expense dictating what the value of the wine shall be, the truth is,
he takes what the causes independently determining the value of the wine
give him. Beyond a doubt there is a relation of cost to value, but there
are instances where the ultimate philosophy that cost is the very essence
of value applies with such unsatisfactory results that any but the most
doctrinaire classical economist must falter and hasten on.
4. If “profits” are a part of entrepreneur’s cost of production, the
question which confronted Ricardo must reappear. Does not the variety
of the proportions in which fixed and circulating capital are combined
in production, free values from the regulation of labor cost? The
consideration of this question in Mill’s _Principles_ is accompanied by
unpardonable blunders in terminology. Mill’s mind seems here completely
tradition-ridden. The havoc is wrought in the use of terms by adopting
the view that besides labor cost influencing value, wages also influence
it. In the topical analysis (Table of Contents, vol. i, p. 15) the
outline of the chapter on cost of production proceeds as follows:
“Principal element in cost of production, quantity of labour.
Wages not an element in cost of production, except in so far as
they vary from employment to employment.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account