History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economyWhitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
History
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy
Whitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
Economics -- Great Britain -- History; Labor theory of value -- Great Britain -- History
“They each ... furnish a centre about which market values
gravitate; but there is this difference between the two
cases: The centre furnished by Cost of Production stands
related to the fluctuations of the individual commodity; that
supplied by Reciprocal Demand to the average fluctuations
of considerable aggregates of commodities. A reduction in
the cost of producing a hat will lower its price.... But an
alteration in the reciprocal demand of two trading nations
(or of two non-competing groups) will act upon the price not
of any commodity in particular but of every commodity which
enters into the trade. What such an alteration necessitates is
a change in the _average_ terms on which the trade is carried
on; but _it decides nothing as to the details by which the
required average shall be attained and maintained_.... In
the interchanges of non-competing domestic groups, what the
reciprocal demand of the groups determines is the average
relative level of prices within each group; the distribution
of price among the individual products being regulated by
the cause which governs value within it, namely, cost of
production.”[190]
It develops that the law of reciprocal demand fails completely of being
a principle coördinate with, and similar to, that of costs. Instead
of ruling exchange values in the same way as cost of production, only
in another field, it turns out that the force of reciprocal demand is
incapable of determining the value of any single good. The principle
of reciprocal demand fails signally of fulfilling Cairnes’s promise of
a principle other than that of cost, which will provide for a central
point of gravitation of inter-group exchange ratios. The purport of the
argument of Cairnes is no more than this: the law of reciprocal demand
merely requires the general level of international exchange values to
be such that in the long run the exports of a nation just discharge its
liabilities, or, in other words, that its exports and imports will be led
to balance, except for the payment of interest on foreign debts, cost of
carriage to foreign ship-owners, _etc._ Cairnes applies the law without
changing line or point to interchange between non-competing groups.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account