History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economyWhitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
History
History and criticism of the labor theory of value in English political economy
Whitaker, Albert C. (Albert Conser)
Economics -- Great Britain -- History; Labor theory of value -- Great Britain -- History
We see that it is possible to mean either pain or potentiality cost by
the words “labor cost.” Labor as “pain” and labor as productive power are
not the same thing but the first is incident to the second. It remains
to consider the relation of entrepreneur’s expense to the two elementary
forms of cost. Torrens desired to exclude the money outlays of the
entrepreneur in interest charges from the money cost of production of a
good. That is, he maintained that what he called “profits,” the chief
constituent of which was interest, is no part of cost of production. This
view was never adopted by any subsequent economist of weight. The very
simple reasons why it is indefensible were mentioned in the chapter on
Torrens. Conceding then that interest is a part of entrepreneur’s cost,
the relation of the latter to “pain cost” can be stated in a few words.
The total “pain cost” of any article, which is produced by entrepreneurs,
finds its remuneration in those payments which go to make up _cost_ from
the view-point of the entrepreneur. The point to be held fast, a point
already emphasized, is that the subjective costs of goods so produced
can influence their exchange values only by way of influencing their
entrepreneur’s costs.
The relation of entrepreneur’s expense to potentiality cost is less
simple and familiar than the foregoing. It will best be taken up in a
subsequent section after we have endeavored to state the gist of the
utility theory of value. We may conclude the present discussion of cost
concepts by noting that there are several ways of reckoning or analyzing
entrepreneur’s cost. (1) Adam Smith’s method, adopted by Malthus, is set
forth in the following definite words written by the latter: “The cost of
producing any commodity is made up of all the wages, all the profits, and
all the rent which ... are necessary to bring that particular commodity
to market in the quantity required.”[208] (2) Perhaps the most approved
modern method of analyzing the elements in entrepreneur’s cost is merely
into wages and interest. In this case rent paid for the use of land is
treated in the same way as rent paid for buildings or for machinery or
power. (3) The most direct treatment of entrepreneur’s cost defines it
shortly as including the prices of all the productive agencies used up in
the making of the product, or as the value of raw material, machinery,
and labor power “entering into” the product. It is always necessary to
explain immediately that some production goods are in no sense consumed
in the making of the product. Such are the land and buildings. Some
production goods are consumed only in very small part in the making of
a single product. The total money cost of a product is according to one
system divided into “prime cost” and “establishment cost.” The former
includes the prices of all those elements which are entirely used up in
making the product. The latter includes the product’s due share of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account