History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of moralsMyers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Philosophy
History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of morals
Myers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Ethics -- History
[124] The Taoist doctrines are contained in the _Tao-teh-king_,
supposed to have been written by Lao-tsze, a sage who lived in the
fifth century B.C. The religion which grew out of his philosophy became
in time degenerate, absorbed the worst elements of Buddhism, and is
to-day a system of gross superstitions, magic, and sorcery, which has
undeniably a blighting effect upon morality.
[125] De Groot, _The Religion of the Chinese_ (1910), pp. 139 ff.
[126] _Ibid._ 138.
[127] Legge, _The Religions of China_ (1881), p. 229.
[128] De Groot, _The Religion of the Chinese_ (1910), p. 143.
[129] Nietzscheism is in essence at one with Taoism. Nietzsche insists
that man should behave as Nature behaves; for instance, that the
strong should prey upon the weak. The difference between Lao-tsze and
Nietzsche lies in their different readings of the essential qualities
of the universe. See below, p. 355.
[130] Taoism is too lofty a doctrine for the multitude. They are
enjoined to imitate the ancient sages, and as these imitated the way
of heaven and earth, in imitating them they are really imitating the
universe.
[131] De Groot, _The Religion of the Chinese_ (1910), p. 143.
[132] The imitation of the qualities of nature “have given existence
to important state institutions, considered to be for the nation and
rulers matters of life and death.” (De Groot, _The Religion of the
Chinese_ (1910), p. 139).
[133] _The Works of Mencius_ (The Chinese Classics, 2d ed., vol. ii),
bk. vi, pt. i, chap. ii, 2.
[134] “This inference [that man is naturally good] comes into
prominence in the classics as a dogma, and therefore has been the
principal basis of all Taoistic and Confucian ethics to this day” (De
Groot, _The Religion of the Chinese_ (1910), p. 137). Every schoolboy
is taught this doctrine: “Man commences life with a virtuous nature”
(Martin, _The Lore of Cathay_ (1901), p. 217).
[135] _The Works of Mencius_, bk. vii, pt. i, chap. ii, 2. And so
Confucius: “An accordance with this nature [man’s] is called the Path
of Duty” (_The Doctrine of the Mean_, chap. i; The Chinese Classics, 2d
ed., vol. i).
[136] _The Works of Mencius_, bk. vi, pt. i, chap. vii, 2, 3.
[137] _Confucian Analects_ (The Chinese Classics, 2d ed., vol. i),
bk. xvii, chap. ii. The student of biology will see in this view an
anticipation of the latest teaching of modern science in respect to the
relative importance of heredity and education in the determining of
character.
[138] “There is nothing in this world so dangerous for the national
safety, public health and welfare as heterodoxy, which means acts,
institutions, doctrines not based upon the classics.”--DE GROOT, _The
Religion of the Chinese_ (1910), p. 48.
[139] Confucius thus describes himself: “A transmitter and not a maker,
believing in and loving the ancients” (_Confucian Analects_, bk. vii,
chap. i).
[140] _The Religions of China_ (1881), p. 255.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account