History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of moralsMyers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Philosophy
History as past ethics; an introduction to the history of morals
Myers, P. V. N. (Philip Van Ness)
Ethics -- History
[658] “One may find ... the chief characteristic of the period of the
migrations in a complete uprooting of public morality, a universal
overturning of inherited conceptions of right and wrong.”--FRANCKE,
_Social Forces in German Literature_, 2d ed., p. 12.
[659] _Parliament of Religions_ (1893), vol. i, pp. 574 f.; consult
also Bryce, _Studies in History and Jurisprudence_ (1901), vol. ii, p.
237.
[660] _Qur’ân_, tr. Palmer (Sacred Books of the East, vols. vi, ix),
suras ii. 184–189, 212–215; iv. 90; viii. 40; ix. 5–14, 29; xlvii. 4,
and many others.
[661] _Ibid._ suras ii. 149; iii. 151; ix. 113.
[662] Sura xxiv. 33. The New Testament nowhere inculcates the
manumission of slaves, but the spirit of its teachings is opposed
to slavery, and the early Fathers of the Church encouraged the
emancipation of slaves.
[663] Sura iv. 3.
[664] Suras vi. 138, 141, 152; xvii. 33.
[665] Suras ii. 216; v. 93.
[666] R. Bosworth Smith, _Mohammed and Mohammedanism_ (1875), p. 204.
[667] Ameer Ali, _The Spirit of Islam_, 2d ed., p. 283.
[668] According to the principles of the Koran, though no Moslem
captive might be reduced to servitude, all non-Moslem prisoners could,
as spoils of war, be enslaved: “We make lawful for ye ... what thy
right hand possesses [slaves] out of the booty God has granted thee”
(sura xxxiii. 49).
[669] “The recognition of the slave traffic by Mohammedanism has been,
and is to this day, a curse to Africa and a source of disturbance to
the world’s politics.”--HOBHOUSE, _Morals in Evolution_ (1906), vol. i,
p. 307.
[670] In an address. Cf. R. Bosworth Smith, _Mohammed and
Mohammedanism_ (1875), pp. 59 ff.
[671] Ameer Ali, _The Spirit of Islam_, 2d ed., p. 328. The author
maintains that Mohammed himself did not intend that his rules should be
binding for all time.
[672] This teaching is one which does not show itself as a generally
recognized principle in the pre-Christian centuries, as does the
principle of love, or self-devotion to the common good, or universal
benevolence. “Christianity at its inception did not take over this
moral principle, ready-made, from any of the older cults or cultures
from which the Christian movement was in a position to draw. It is not
found, at least in appreciable force, in the received Judaism; nor can
it be derived from the classical (Greco-Roman) cultures, which had none
of it” (Thorstein B. Veblen, “Christian Morals and the Competitive
System,” _The International Journal of Ethics_ for January, 1910).
[673] “Christian mores in the Western Empire were formed by syncretism
of Jewish and pagan mores. Christian mores therefore contain war,
slavery, concubinage, demonism, and base amusements, together
with some abstract ascetic doctrines with which these things are
inconsistent.”--SUMNER, _Folkways_ (1907), p. 116.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account