History of Ancient Pottery: Greek, Etruscan, and Roman. Volume 1 (of 2)Walters, H. B. (Henry Beauchamp)
History
History of Ancient Pottery: Greek, Etruscan, and Roman. Volume 1 (of 2)
Walters, H. B. (Henry Beauchamp)
Mythology, Classical, in art; Pottery, Ancient; Pottery, Etruscan; Pottery, Greek; Pottery, Roman
_Graec. Ling. Dialect_, i. p. 247.
Footnote 453:
viii. 381: see also p. 50.
Footnote 454:
See p. 499.
Footnote 455:
Suet. _Ner._ 47: see Robert, _Homer. Becher_, and _Class. Review_,
1894, p. 325. The British Museum possesses a silver phiale, with
terracotta replicas (G 117, 118), one of which is shown on Plate
XLVIII. See also p. 500.
Footnote 456:
Cf. the use of the word δημόσιον on bronze and lead weights.
Footnote 457:
Egger in _Revue Archéol._ xvi. (1867), p. 292.
Footnote 458:
See Hultsch, _Metrologie_, p. 99 ff.
Footnote 459:
Arist. _Categ._ 12; also Polybius, iv. 56, ἡτοίμασαν οίνου κεράμια
μύρια.
Footnote 460:
B.M. F 175.
Footnote 461:
Other instances are: Millingen-Reinach, 2; Munich 423; Reinach, i.
291–92.
Footnote 462:
Cf. B.M. E 534–37, 548–53; also Stackelberg, _Gräber der Hellenen_,
pl. 17. Fig. 15 is from the vase F 101 in the British Museum.
Footnote 463:
Cf. B.M. F 457–66.
Footnote 464:
_Suppl._ 463.
Footnote 465:
_E.g._ B.M. E 494. See also Chapter XV.
Footnote 466:
See Schol. _in_ Ar. _Ran._ 218, and _J.H.S._ xx. p. 110 ff.
Footnote 467:
For explanation and parallels see Frazer, _Golden Bough_, ii. p. 119
ff.
Footnote 468:
Raoul-Rochette in _Revue Archéol._ viii. (1851), p. 112: see also
Theocr. xv. 113 ff.
Footnote 469:
_Revue Archéol. l.c._ p. 118; Mart. xi. 19; Pliny, _H.N._ xix. 59.
Footnote 470:
_Hist. Plant._ vi. 7.
Footnote 471:
Pernice in _Jahrbuch_, 1899, p. 60 ff. He would also regard the
so-called σμηματοθήκη (see p. 198) as a vase of this class; but this
seems much more doubtful. See also p. 167, under πλημοχόη.
Footnote 472:
Cf. Böhlau, _Ion. u. Ital. Nekrop._ p. 39; Berlin 1108.
Footnote 473:
Pernice’s arguments have been directly impugned by Kouroniotes in Ἐφ.
Ἀρχ. 1899, p. 233, and by Robinson in _Boston Mus. Report_, p. 73;
and it certainly seems more probable that metal vessels would have
been used for this purpose; moreover, the form of the θυμιατήριον is
well known. But he has personally assured the present writer that the
clay κώθωνες show traces internally of the use of fire.
Footnote 474:
Reinach, i. 235 = Naples 3255.
Footnote 475:
See p. 214.
Footnote 476:
_Adv. Leoch._ 1086, 1089.
Footnote 477:
Cf. _B.M. Cat. of Sculpture_, i. p. 297.
Footnote 478:
See note on p. 132 above. The custom seems to have been specially in
favour in the fourth century B.C.
Footnote 479:
_E.g._ B.M. D 65, 70–1; _J.H.S._ xix. pl. 2. On the subject
generally, see _ibid._ p. 169 ff.
Footnote 480:
Fig. 20 = F 93, a Lucanian hydria in the British Museum, is a very
fine instance, several of the vases being represented with painted
subjects. Among them is a Panathenaic amphora (see above, p. 132), on
which is depicted a chariot-race.
Footnote 481:
_Il._ xxiii. 253.
Footnote 482:
Q. Smyrn. iii. 737.
Footnote 483:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account