xi. 461 B, 497 B. Footnote 700: διατετρημένον, Athen. xi. 497 E. Footnote 701: Exx. in B.M. F 417–36. Footnote 702: xi. 500 E. In the temple of Apollo at Branchidae there were παλίμποτοι, τραγέλαφοι, πρότομοι, with dedicatory inscriptions to Apollo and Artemis; evidently _rhyta_ of this kind (Boeckh, _C.I.G._ ii. 2852). An example in the B.M. (F 431) ends in the heads of a boar and dog conjoined. Footnote 703: xi. 468 F; cf. 497 A. Footnote 704: xi. 496 E; other names for the rhyton are δικέρας (Pollux, vi. 97), ἐνιαυτός, ὄλμος, and παλίμποτος: see note 702. Footnote 705: _In Meid._ 565 fin. Footnote 706: See p. 127 and Plate X. Footnote 707: Pollux, vi. 84–5; x. 86; Ar. _passim_; Lucian, _Somn._ 14, p. 723 (τρύβλιον); see Ussing, _De nom. vas. graec._ p. 160 ff. Footnote 708: Schöne in _Comm. phil. in hon. Mommseni_, p. 653, mentions a plate with ΙΧΘΥΑΙ inscribed underneath. Cf. also Plate XLIV. and p. 487. Footnote 709: See p. 139. Footnote 710: Pollux, vi. 85; x. 86; Ar. _Ran._ 1440, _Plut._ 812, _Av._ 361; Athen. ii. 67 D, xi. 494 C. Cf. for these words Chapter XVII. Footnote 711: x. 92. Liddell and Scott state that ἐρεύς is a _vox nihili_. Footnote 712: Pollux, x. 93. Footnote 713: xi. 476 E. Footnote 714: See _Brit. School Annual_, iii. (1896–97) p. 58; _Ath. Mitth._ 1898, p. 271; Couve in Daremberg and Saglio’s _Dict. s.v._ Kernos. Athenaeus cannot have known this type. Footnote 715: _Ath. Mitth._ 1898, pls. 13, 14; _Ephem. Arch._ 1885, pl. 9, 1897, p. 163 ff. Footnote 716: _Ath. Mitth._ _loc. cit._ p. 295. Footnote 717: See _Jahrbuch_, 1894, p. 57 ff. Footnote 718: Cf. Dem. _Fals. Leg._ p. 415, and p. 133 above. Footnote 719: Athen. xi. 784 B. Footnote 720: See Pollux, vii. 166; x. 63. Footnote 721: xi. 783 F; he derives the -βαλλος from βαλάντιον (_sic_). He also says it is like the αρύστιχος, and that ἀρυστίς = πρόχοος. Footnote 722: See Athen. xi. 784 D; Pollux, vi. 98; Hippokrates, 494, 55. Footnote 723: He somewhat vaguely identifies it with the Thericleian and Rhodian kylikes. Pollux (vi. 98) also implies it to be a cup. Footnote 724: See Ussing, p. 117; Pollux, vi. 106, x. 121; Ar. _Ach._ 1063. Footnote 725: Hesych. _s.v._ ῥύμμα. Also called σμηματοδοκίς. Footnote 726: _E.g._ B.M. 208, 225, 376, 386, 794, 810, D 65. But see on this shape Pernice in _Jahrbuch_, 1899, p. 68, and Robinson in _Boston Mus. Report_, 1899, p. 73. The latter rejects Pernice’s incense-burner theory (see above, p. 140), and suggests their use for perfume or scented water. Footnote 727: The B.M. has a late B.F. example, B 298. Footnote 728: _Jahrbuch___, 1899, p. 129. Footnote 729: E 774; E 810 in the B.M. is a good example of this form. Footnote 730: It was formerly thought to be a kind of roof-tile. See Robert in Ἐφ. Ἀρχ. 1892, p. 247; B.M. B 597, 598; Athens 1588–92. Footnote 731: