History of Ancient Pottery: Greek, Etruscan, and Roman. Volume 2 (of 2)Walters, H. B. (Henry Beauchamp)
History
History of Ancient Pottery: Greek, Etruscan, and Roman. Volume 2 (of 2)
Walters, H. B. (Henry Beauchamp)
Mythology, Classical, in art; Pottery, Ancient; Pottery, Etruscan; Pottery, Greek; Pottery, Roman
_E.g._ B.M. B 164, B 254; Louvre F 297 = Reinach, ii. 26.
Footnote 2163:
Kretschmer, p. 85: see p 92.
Footnote 2164:
Munich 6: see Vol. I. p. 428, and Hoppin, _Euthymides_, p. 18.
Footnote 2165:
_Monuments Piot_, ix. pl. 2.
Footnote 2166:
Berlin 1737.
Footnote 2167:
Munich 333 = Reinach, ii. 119.
Footnote 2168:
Berlin 1704 = Reinach, i. 198; Vol. I. p. 326.
Footnote 2169:
Berlin 1732 = Reinach, ii. 66.
Footnote 2170:
Plate XXIII.: see Vol. I. p. 326.
Footnote 2171:
Bibl. Nat. 219.
Footnote 2172:
Louvre F 385 = Millingen, _Anc. Uned. Mon._ pl. 38.
Footnote 2173:
Reinach, ii. 49.
Footnote 2174:
Kretschmer, p. 86.
Footnote 2175:
Reinach, ii. 128.
Footnote 2176:
Kretschmer, pp. 86, 197.
Footnote 2177:
See Kretschmer, p. 86.
Footnote 2178:
_Cat._ 1158 = _Ath. Mitth._ 1884, pl. 1.
Footnote 2179:
Kretschmer, _loc. cit._: cf. Bergk, _Poet. lyr. Gr._ iii.^4 p. 97,
frag. 23.
Footnote 2180:
See Hartwig, _Meistersch._ p. 255.
Footnote 2181:
Petersburg 1670. The Doric dialect is explained by Kretschmer as due
to the Sicilian origin of the game.
Footnote 2182:
_Sc._ “hard to beat.”
Footnote 2183:
Kretschmer, p. 88.
Footnote 2184:
_I.e._ κυβιστητῆρι.
Footnote 2185:
Reinach, i. 294. Probably, as Kretschmer points out, a dog of Melita
off Illyricum, not of Malta.
Footnote 2186:
Kretschmer, p. 91.
Footnote 2187:
Benndorf, _Gr. u. sic. Vasenb._ pl. 1.
Footnote 2188:
Helbig, 186 = _Wiener Vorl._ 1889, pl. 8, 6.
Footnote 2189:
Reinach, i. 96.
Footnote 2190:
Reinach, i. 106.
Footnote 2191:
This translation is somewhat doubtful: see Reinach, _loc. cit._
Footnote 2192:
_Cat._ 688 = Reinach, i. 164.
Footnote 2193:
Reinach, i. 513.
Footnote 2194:
Athens 1241 = Dumont-Pottier, i. pl. 6.
Footnote 2195:
Plate XXXIX.
Footnote 2196:
On the form of the Δ see below, p. 268.
Footnote 2197:
_Brit. Sch. Annual_, 1898–99, p. 65.
Footnote 2198:
Reinach, i. 277: see on the subject, _Hermes_, 1898, p. 640; _Notizie
degli Scavi_, 1895, 86 ff.; and above, pp. 115, 137.
Footnote 2199:
See on this subject, Urlichs, _Beiträge_, p. 33 ff., and Vol. I. p.
389.
Footnote 2200:
Athen. xi. 466 D; not found on Attic vases, but cf. B.M. F 548.
Footnote 2201:
B.M. B 415, 422; Berlin 1775–76.
Footnote 2202:
Berlin 1764; Munich 37. For variations see Kretschmer, p. 195.
Footnote 2203:
See Klein, _Meisters._ p. 110; Kretschmer, p. 82.
Footnote 2204:
Instances are B.M. B 330, B 339, B 631, E 182, E 718.
Footnote 2205:
_E.g._ B.M. B 400.
Footnote 2206:
_Cat._ 334 = Reinach, i. 79. The vase is probably by Charinos.
Footnote 2207:
Cf. the story of Pericles and Sophocles told by Cicero, _De Offic._
i. 40, 144.
Footnote 2208:
_Vasen mit Lieblingsinschriften_, 2nd edn., 1898. Of these, 528 are
masculine names, and only 30 feminine.
Footnote 2209:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account