In 1868 Huggins[6] succeeded in thus measuring the velocities of stars
in the direction of the line of sight.
In 1873 Vogel[7] compared the spectra of the sun’s East (approaching)
limb and West (receding) limb, and the displacement of lines endorsed
the theory. This last observation was suggested by Zöllner.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] In the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, article “Telescope,” and in
Grant’s _Physical Astronomy_, good reasons are given for awarding the
honour to Lipperhey.
[2] Will the indulgent reader excuse an anecdote which may encourage
some workers who may have found their mathematics defective through
want of use? James Gregory’s nephew David had a heap of MS. notes by
Newton. These descended to a Miss Gregory, of Edinburgh, who handed
them to the present writer, when an undergraduate at Cambridge, to
examine. After perusal, he lent them to his kindest of friends, J. C.
Adams (the discoverer of Neptune), for his opinion. Adams’s final
verdict was: “I fear they are of no value. It is pretty evident that,
when he wrote these notes, _Newton’s mathematics were a little
rusty_.”
[3] _R. S. Phil. Trans_.
[4] The experiment had been made before by one who did not understand
its meaning;. But Sir George G. Stokes had already given verbally the
true explanation of Frauenhofer lines.
[5] _Abh. d. Kön. Böhm. d. Wiss_., Bd. ii., 1841-42, p. 467. See also
Fizeau in the _Ann. de Chem. et de Phys_., 1870, p. 211.
[6] _R. S. Phil. Trans_., 1868.
[7] _Ast. Nach_., No. 1, 864.
BOOK IV. THE PHYSICAL PERIOD
We have seen how the theory of the solar system was slowly developed by
the constant efforts of the human mind to find out what are the rules
of cause and effect by which our conception of the present universe and
its development seems to be bound. In the primitive ages a mere record
of events in the heavens and on the earth gave the only hope of
detecting those uniform sequences from which to derive rules or laws of
cause and effect upon which to rely. Then came the geometrical age, in
which rules were sought by which to predict the movements of heavenly
bodies. Later, when the relation of the sun to the courses of the
planets was established, the sun came to be looked upon as a cause; and
finally, early in the seventeenth century, for the first time in
history, it began to be recognised that the laws of dynamics, exactly
as they had been established for our own terrestrial world, hold good,
with the same rigid invariability, at least as far as the limits of the
solar system.
Throughout this evolution of thought and conjecture there were two
types of astronomers—those who supplied the facts, and those who
supplied the interpretation through the logic of mathematics. So
Ptolemy was dependent upon Hipparchus, Kepler on Tycho Brahe, and
Newton in much of his work upon Flamsteed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account