Ever since Halley discovered that the comet of 1682 was a member of the
solar system, these wonderful objects have had a new interest for
astronomers; and a comparison of orbits has often identified the return
of a comet, and led to the detection of an elliptic orbit where the
difference from a parabola was imperceptible in the small portion of
the orbit visible to us. A remarkable case in point was the comet of
1556, of whose identity with the comet of 1264 there could be little
doubt. Hind wanted to compute the orbit more exactly than Halley had
done. He knew that observations had been made, but they were lost.
Having expressed his desire for a search, all the observations of
Fabricius and of Heller, and also a map of the comet’s path among the
stars, were eventually unearthed in the most unlikely manner, after
being lost nearly three hundred years. Hind and others were certain
that this comet would return between 1844 and 1848, but it never
appeared.
When the spectroscope was first applied to finding the composition of
the heavenly bodies, there was a great desire to find out what comets
are made of. The first opportunity came in 1864, when Donati observed
the spectrum of a comet, and saw three bright bands, thus proving that
it was a gas and at least partly self-luminous. In 1868 Huggins
compared the spectrum of Winnecke’s comet with that of a Geissler tube
containing olefiant gas, and found exact agreement. Nearly all comets
have shown the same spectrum.[1] A very few comets have given bright
band spectra differing from the normal type. Also a certain kind of
continuous spectrum, as well as reflected solar light showing
Frauenhofer lines, have been seen.
[Illustration: COPY OF THE DRAWING MADE BY PAUL FABRICIUS.
To define the path of comet 1556. After being lost for 300 years, this
drawing was recovered by the prolonged efforts of Mr. Hind and
Professor Littrow in 1856.]
When Wells’s comet, in 1882, approached very close indeed to the sun,
the spectrum changed to a mono-chromatic yellow colour, due to sodium.
For a full account of the wonders of the cometary world the reader is
referred to books on descriptive astronomy, or to monographs on
comets.[2] Nor can the very uncertain speculations about the structure
of comets’ tails be given here. A new explanation has been proposed
almost every time that a great discovery has been made in the theory of
light, heat, chemistry, or electricity.
Halley’s comet remained the only one of which a prediction of the
return had been confirmed, until the orbit of the small, ill-defined
comet found by Pons in 1819 was computed by Encke, and found to have a
period of 3 1/3 years. It was predicted to return in 1822, and was
recognised by him as identical with many previous comets. This comet,
called after Encke, has showed in each of its returns an inexplicable
reduction of mean distance, which led to the assertion of a resisting
medium in space until a better explanation could be found.[3]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account