That others besides Schleiden in the period following 1840 felt
strongly, that botany must thenceforward give up its complacent resting
in the old ideas, was shown among other things by the addition at this
time of new periodicals to the old journal ‘Flora.’ The ‘Botanische
Zeitung’ was founded by von Mohl and Schlechtendal in 1843, and the
‘Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Botanik’ by Schleiden and Nägeli.
The latter, however, only lived three years, from 1844 to 1846, and was
filled almost entirely with Nägeli’s contributions. Both publications
expressly set themselves the task of representing the new aims in the
science. The immediate consequence was that ‘Flora’ braced up its
energies, and endeavoured to do more justice to the modern spirit;
excellent notices of botanical works now appeared in it under the
exclusive management of Fürnrohr.
Schleiden’s productivity in the higher sense of the word expended
itself in his labours on the elements of scientific botany. His
later somewhat discursive writings exerted no great influence on the
further development of the science. The ideal which he had set up for
scientific botany and had sketched in its larger outlines, could only
be realised by the most persevering labour not of one man only, but of
whole generations of observers and thinkers, nor did he apply himself
with painful unremitting industry to the attainment of this exalted aim.
Soon after Schleiden’s ‘Grundzüge’ first stirred the scientific world,
a man of a very different character of mind began to address himself
to the great task. This was CARL NÄGELI, whose researches from this
time onwards laid the foundations of knowledge in every department of
botany. He showed what points were the most immediately attainable, and
aided in perfecting the inductive method of enquiry and in advancing
the study of the history of development. He did not make discoveries
here and there by desultory efforts, but worked with earnest endurance
at every question which he took up till he had arrived at a positive
result; and this was almost always an enlargement of previous
knowledge, and a new foundation on which others might build, and a
copious literature be developed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account