Camerarius had observed, that a female mulberry-tree once bore fruit,
though no male tree (amentaceis floribus) was in its neighbourhood,
but that the berries contained only abortive and empty seeds, which he
compared to the addled eggs of a bird. His attention was roused, and
he made his first experiment on another dioecious plant, Mercurialis
annua; he took in the end of May two female specimens of the wild plant
(they were usually called male, but he knew them to be the female) and
set them in pots apart from others. The plants throve, the fruit was
abundant and filled out, but when half ripe they began to dry up, and
not one produced perfect seeds; his communication on this subject is
dated December 28, 1691. In the third decury of the Ephemerides, year
5, he relates that in a sowing of spinach he had found monoecious as
well as dioecious plants, as Ray had observed in Urtica romana, and he
himself again in three other species. The disregard of this fact was
afterwards the cause of erroneous interpretation of the experiments and
of doubt about sexuality.
But Camerarius’ chief composition on the subject of sexuality in
plants is his letter ‘De sexu Plantarum,’ which is often mentioned but
apparently little read, and which he addressed to Valentin, Professor
in Giessen, on Aug. 25, 1694. It is the most elaborate treatise on the
subject which had as yet been written, or indeed which appeared before
the middle of the 18th century, and contains more profound observations
than were made by any other botanist before Koelreuter. The style
contrasts favourably with the style of the writers of the time, and
is thoroughly that of modern natural science; it combines perfect
knowledge with careful criticism of the literature of the subject;
the construction of the flower is explained more clearly than it had
ever been before, or was again for a long time after, and expressly
for the purpose of making the meaning of his experiments on sexuality
intelligible. The whole tone of the letter shows that Camerarius was
deeply impressed with the extraordinary importance of the question, and
that he was concerned to establish the existence of sexuality by every
possible means.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account