The idea of Cesalpino, that the parts of the flower which surround the
fruit arise like the ordinary leaves from the tissues that enclose
the pith, is further developed by Linnaeus in his ‘Metamorphosis
Plantarum,’ in the fourth volume of the ‘Amoenitates Academicae’
(1759), in a very strange manner. He compares the formation of the
flower with the metamorphosis of animals, and especially of insects,
and after describing the changes that take place in animals, he says at
page 370 that plants are subject to similar change. The metamorphosis
of insects consists in the putting off different skins, so that
they finally come forth naked in their true and perfect form. This
metamorphosis we also find in most plants, for they consist, at least
in the truly living part of the root, of rind, bast, wood, and pith.
The rind is to the plant what the skin is to the larva of an insect,
and after putting this skin off there remains a naked insect. When
the flower is produced in the plant the rind opens and forms the calyx
(exactly Cesalpino’s view), and from out of this the inner parts of the
plant issue to form the flower, so that the bast, the wood, and the
pith issue forth naked in the form of corolla, stamens, and stigma. So
long as the plant lies concealed within the rind and clothed only with
leaves, it appears to us as unrecognisable and obscure as a butterfly,
which in its larva-condition is covered with skin and spines.
In this doctrine of metamorphosis, which Linnaeus founded on Cesalpino,
the chief point to observe is, that the ordinary leaves are identical
with the exterior parts of the flower, because both originate in the
outer tissues of the stem. The pertinent fact, which may easily be
observed without a microscope, that the concentric arrangement of
outer and inner rind, wood, and pith occurs only in some flowering
plants, that the case is quite different with Monocotyledons, and
that Cesalpino’s theory of the flower cannot properly be applied to
them,—these are things which we must not expect to find Linnaeus with
his peculiar modes of thought taking into consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account