But in course of time two very different tendencies were developed;
most of the German, English, and Swedish botanists adhered strictly to
Linnaeus’ dictum, that the merit of a botanist was to be judged by the
number of species with which he was acquainted; they accepted Linnaeus’
sexual system as one that completed the science in every respect; they
thought that botany had reached its culminating point in Linnaeus, and
that any improvement or addition could only be made in details, by
continuing to smooth over some unevennesses in the system, to collect
new species and describe them. The inevitable result was that botany
ceased to be a science; even the describing of plants which Linnaeus
had raised to an art became once more loose and negligent in the hands
of such successors; in place of the morphological examination of the
parts of plants there was an endless accumulating of technical terms
devoid of depth of scientific meaning, till at length a text-book of
botany came to look more like a Latin dictionary than a scientific
treatise. In proof of this we may appeal to Bernhardi’s ‘Handbuch
der Botanik,’ published at Erfurt in 1804, and Bernhardi was one of
the best representatives of German botany of the time. How botany,
especially in Germany, gradually degenerated under the influence of
Linnaeus’ authority into an easy-going insipid dilettantism may very
well be seen from the botanical periodical, entitled ‘Flora,’ the first
volumes of which cover the greater part of the first fifty years of the
19th century; it is scarcely conceivable how men of some cultivation
could occupy themselves with such worthless matter. It would be quite
lost labour to give any detailed account of this kind of scientific
life, if it can be so called, this dull occupation of plant-collectors,
who called themselves systematists, in entire contravention of the
meaning of the word. It is true indeed that these adherents of Linnaeus
did some service to botany by searching the floras of Europe and of
other quarters of the globe, but they left it to others to turn to
scientific account the material which they collected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account