CLASS.
Acotyledones I.
{ Stamina hypogyna II.
Monocotyledones { perigyna III.
{ epigyna IV.
{ { Stamina epigyna V.
{ Apetalae { perigyna VI.
{ { hypogyna VII.
{ { Corolla hypogyna VIII.
{ Monopetalae{ perigyna IX.
Dicotyledones.{ { epigyna { antheris connatis X.
{ { { distinctis XI.
{ { Stamina epigyna XII.
{ Polypetalae{ hypogyna XIII.
{ { perigyna XIV.
{ Diclines irregulares XV.
This table shows that Jussieu did not oppose the Cryptogams, which
he calls Acotyledones, to the whole body of Phanerogams, as Ray did
under the name of Imperfectae; he rather regards the Acotyledones as
a class co-ordinate with the Monocotyledones and Dicotyledones; but
this mistake or similar mistaken views run through all systematic
botany up to 1840; the morphology founded by Nägeli and by Hofmeister’s
embryological investigations first showed that the Cryptogams separate
into several divisions, which co-ordinate with the Monocotyledons
and Dicotyledons. At the same time the use of the word Acotyledones
for Linnaeus’ Cryptogams shows that Jussieu overrated the systematic
value of the cotyledons, because, as is seen from the introduction
to his ‘Genera Plantarum,’ he was quite in the dark on the subject
of the great difference between the spores of Cryptogamic plants and
the seeds of Phanerogams. His conception of the organs of generation
was essentially that of Linnaeus; hence he judged of the Cryptogams
according to the scheme of the Phanerogams, and, not perceiving their
peculiarities, he virtually characterised them by negative marks.
If we notice in the above table how the Phanerogams are separated
into classes, it strikes us that the triple division into hypogynous,
perigynous, and epigynous is repeated no less than four times; this
shows that Jussieu had mistaken ideas of the value of these marks for
classification, whereas the recurrence of them so often should of
itself have suggested a doubt on this point. To judge of his system
more exactly we must here give his series of the families, which he had
already raised to the number of a hundred.
Class I.
1. Fungi.
2. Algae.
3. Hepaticae.
4. Musci.
5. Filices.
6. Naiades.
Class II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account