History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8Bancroft, Hubert Howe
History
History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8
Bancroft, Hubert Howe
Central America -- History
The acts of several congresses of Nicaragua in after years indicated
that the treaty was recognized beyond cavil or dispute. Not a word was
officially uttered by Nicaragua in seven years against its validity.
After such a period had elapsed, Tomás Ayon, her minister of foreign
affairs, in a report to the national congress, disputed its validity,
and the boundary question was reopened,[XI-70] giving rise to grave
diplomatic discussions, and no little ill feeling between the citizens
of both countries from 1868 to 1883.[XI-71] At last, early in 1883,
a treaty was signed in Granada by plenipotentiaries of both countries
to bring the dispute to an end.[XI-72] President Cárdenas, in laying
the treaty before the Nicaraguan congress early in 1885, urged its
favorable consideration; but no action was taken.
[Illustration: COSTA RICA.]
[Sidenote: DIVERS TREATIES.]
[Sidenote: DISPUTED TERRITORY.]
Under the Gual-Molina treaty, concluded at Bogotá, March 15, 1825, the
Provincias Unidas del Centro de América and the Republic of Colombia
agreed to respect the boundaries then existing between them, and to
enter at an early convenient opportunity into a special convention
directed to fix the dividing line.[XI-73] The antecedents of the
subject will be found in a note at foot.[XI-74] All subsequent royal
provisions, down to 1803, tend to confirm the limits of Costa Rica
that were fixed for Cherino on the Atlantic side. But on the 20th of
November, 1803, a royal order placed the island of San Andrés, and
the coast of Mosquito from Cape Gracias á Dios to the River Chagres,
under the supervision of the viceroy at Bogotá. Nueva Granada, now
República de Colombia, has maintained that this royal order made a new
territorial division between the capitanía general of Guatemala and the
vireinato of Nueva Granada; and to the latter belongs all the territory
alluded to in the royal order, and that said territory was recognized
as hers by the Gual-Molina treaty. On behalf of Costa Rica, it has
been alleged that the Spanish crown never made a territorial division
with a mere royal order. The division of provinces, vice-royalties,
and captain-generalcies was effected under a pragmatic sanction, a
royal decree, or a royal cédula. The royal order aforesaid made no
division of territory, but merely placed San Andrés and the Mosquito
Coast under the care of the viceroy at Bogotá because Spain at that
time had military and naval resources at Cartagena. Nevertheless the
order had no effect; it became a dead letter, the viceroy never having
protected that coast. Such was the impression of the Central American
negotiator of the treaty of 1825.[XI-75] With this same understanding
the federal government of Central America made a contract in 1836 to
settle an Irish colony in the region of Boca del Toro,[XI-76] which
was not carried out because the New Granadan authorities drove away the
settlers, and have ever since held control of the region, disregarding
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account