History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8Bancroft, Hubert Howe
History
History of Central America, Volume 3, 1801-1887: The Works of Hubert Howe Bancroft, Volume 8
Bancroft, Hubert Howe
Central America -- History
The act of Patzicia was accepted by the principal towns in the
republic, save those of the departments of Santa Rosa and Chiquimula.
The government decreed several liberal measures, and restored
diplomatic relations with Costa Rica.[XX-35]
[Sidenote: DOWNFALL OF THE CLERGY.]
The new administration had hardly initiated reforms when an
insurrection broke out in Santa Rosa, promoted by the priests and
their aristocratic allies. It does not appear that García Granados had
at first intended open hostility to the religious orders. The tone
of his address, early in September 1871, to the Santa Rosa Indians,
indicated that his plans involved absolute religious tolerance.[XX-36]
The priests would not rest contented with the loss of their former high
standing.[XX-37] Had they remained quiet, it is not likely they would
have been molested. The president's call on the insurgents of Santa
Rosa to submit was disregarded, but their movement was quelled by the
end of the month with much bloodshed.[XX-38] An amnesty was granted to
rebels surrendering to the authorities. The decree of martial law was
repealed; and the ministers then in charge of the executive made García
Granados a captain-general and Barrios a lieutenant-general.[XX-39]
* * * * *
[Sidenote: SUPPRESSION OF RELIGIOUS HOUSES.]
The new régime now resolved to cut loose of the ecclesiastical incubus,
and to establish the supremacy of the civil authority in the state
on a firm basis. Its first step was to carry out a decree of the
revolutionary government, dated May 24, 1870, to expel the society of
Jesus forever from the republic.[XX-40] This was not effected without
some scandal and disturbance from the zealous partisans of the order.
Seventy-three jesuits, most of whom were foreigners, were sent away
on an American steamship, bound to Panamá.[XX-41] They did not go so
far down, however, as will be shown elsewhere. The decree under which
this expulsion was effected resembled that of April 2, 1767, issued by
Cárlos III.[XX-42]
Archbishop Piñol of Guatemala, and Ortiz Urruela, bishop of Teya
in partibus infidelium, for their marked hostility in promoting
rebellion, were, on October 17th, ordered to leave the country, and
they departed without offering any resistance. The tithes tax was at
once suppressed.[XX-43] On the 7th of June, 1872, religious communities
of men were extinguished, causing great excitement, but owing to the
energy of the government it soon died out.[XX-44] Nor did the action
of the government stop here. The fuero eclesiástico in both civil
and criminal causes was done away with March 12, 1873, and freedom of
worship decreed on the 15th.[XX-45]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account