History of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, Vol. 2 (of 2)Dunham, S. A. (Samuel Astley)
History
History of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Dunham, S. A. (Samuel Astley)
Scandinavia -- History
the excommunication of Otho and of archbishop Valdemar by the pope. The
first soon died; the latter, succeeded by the bishop of Osnaburg,
retired to a monastery, and was for ever dead to the world.
[Sidenote: 1219 to 1223.]
Freed from the cares which had so long distracted him, the king again
turned his eyes towards Livonia. His former successes in that region had
not corresponded with his preparations: the bishop of Riga was
persecuted alike by the pagan inhabitants and the Greek Christians: the
glory of vindicating the true faith was no slight one in his estimation;
but the ambition of reigning over the whole maritime coast of the
Baltic, from Holstein to Livonia, was a still greater inducement for
undertaking a new expedition. Never had Denmark equipped so great an
armament as that which now left her ports. The Esthonians, against whom
his attacks were chiefly directed, prepared to receive him, but they
were defeated; a new city, Revel, was built, to awe the province; and a
Christian bishop made it his metropolis. The advantages resulting from
this conquest were almost neutralised by the hostility of the bishop of
Riga, who regarded his new brother as an intruder on his own domain. He
claimed the greater part of Esthonia as a part of his jurisdiction, and
he sent his missionaries through it to reclaim it from idolatry. On the
other hand, the archbishop of Lund, in behalf of his royal master,
prohibited those missionaries from labouring in their vocation, and sent
those of his own country and his own church to oppose them. It will
scarcely be credited by modern readers—though the fact seems
indisputable—that the Danes actually hung an Esthonian prince for no
other crime than that he had received baptism at the hands of the bishop
of Riga’s dependents. What were the motives—shrewd though pagan—to infer
from this and similar facts other than this—that the god of the Danes
was not the god of the Germans? The pope and the emperor declared for
the Danish king, in opposition to the complaints, the remonstrances, of
the bishop. At length Valdemar, of his own accord, abated much of his
pretensions, and allowed a portion of the disputed territory to be ceded
to the bishop, and to the Christian knights whom that bishop had taken
into his service.
[Sidenote: 1223.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account