History of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, Vol. 2 (of 2)Dunham, S. A. (Samuel Astley)
History
History of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Dunham, S. A. (Samuel Astley)
Scandinavia -- History
In 1272 died Eric, duke of Sleswic—an event which again disturbed the
tranquillity of the country. He left two sons, Valdemar and Eric, both
minors. To the guardianship a claim was put in by the king, and another
by the counts of Holstein. Both parties flew to arms, and at first the
counts had the advantage; but seeing the royal forces augmented, they
consented to resign the trust into the royal hands, on the condition of
his investing the eldest with the duchy when arrived at the due age.
Eric now celebrated his marriage with Agnes of Brandenburg; and he had
also the satisfaction to see the convocation of a general council, (that
of Lyons, 1274,) destined to remove the interdict from his kingdom. He
was, however, enjoined not merely to receive the primate into his
friendship, but to pay him 15,000 marks by way of indemnification. This
may appear a large sum, and it has been censured by historians. They
forget, however, to tell us that during the long absence of the
archbishop, he had been receiving the revenues of the see—an amount many
times greater than the indemnification. The following year (1275), a
national council held at Lund finished the work of reconciling the king
with the church.
[Sidenote: 1280 to 1286.]
But if Eric was thus at peace with his spiritual, he was often in
disputes with his temporal, barons, on whose rights he was always ready
to encroach. Notwithstanding his treaty with the counts of Holstein, he
endeavoured to evade the investiture of Sleswic in favour of Valdemar.
Both parties, however, were equally to blame; for when Valdemar was
invested, he claimed other domains in Frisia, on the plea that they
belonged to his paternal uncle. When this was refused, he leagued
himself with the enemies of Denmark: the plot was discovered, and he was
imprisoned while at Eric’s court. But his detention was of short
duration; and at the intercession of his allies, he was enlarged, after
subscribing some conditions which more clearly established the authority
of the crown over the fief. Still, if one enemy was vanquished, others
remained, and to some of them, or rather to his own vices, the king fell
a victim. To the count of Halland he had been oppressive: he had
deprived him of his domains, and if report were true, dishonoured the
wife during the husband’s absence. Revenge was sworn, and the oath was
kept. One night, after hunting, he was murdered asleep at a rural
village in Jutland. The king’s chamberlain was privy to the design: it
was he who guided the assassins (all in masks) to the bed. They
subsequently fled to Norway, by the king of which they were protected
against the vengeance of Eric’s family.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account