History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12)Maspero, G. (Gaston)
History
History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 2 (of 12)
Maspero, G. (Gaston)
Civilization, Ancient; Egypt -- History -- To 640 A.D.; History, Ancient; Middle East -- History
Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Émil Brugsch-Bey. The
temple of the Sphinx is in the foreground, covered with sand
up to the top of the walls. The second of the little
pyramids below the large one is that whose construction is
attributed to Honîtsonû, the daughter of Kheops, and with
regard to which the dragomans of the Saite period told such
strange stories to Herodotus.
A small mound which commanded this prospect was roughly squared, and
incorporated into the masonry; the rest of the site was levelled to
receive the first course of stones. The pyramid when completed had a
height of 476 feet on a base 764 feet square; but the decaying influence
of time has reduced these dimensions to 450 and 730 feet respectively.
It possessed, up to the Arab conquest, its polished facing, coloured
by age, and so subtily jointed that one would have said that it was a
single slab from top to bottom.* The work of facing the pyramid began
at the top; that of the point was first placed in position, then the
courses were successively covered until the bottom was reached.**
* The blocks which still exist are of white limestone.
Letronne, after having asserted in his youth (Recherches sur
Dicuil, p. 107), on the authority of a fragment attributed
to Philo of Byzantium, that the facing was formed of
polychromatic zones of granite, of green breccia and other
different kinds of stone, renounced this view owing to the
evidence of Vyse. Perrot and Chipiez have revived it, with
some hesitation.
** Herodotus, ii. 125, the word “point” should not be taken
literally. The Great Pyramid terminated, like its neighbour,
in a platform, of which each side measured nine English feet
(six cubits, according to Diodorus Siculus, i. 63), and
which has become larger in the process of time, especially
since the destruction of the facing. The summit viewed from
below must have appeared as a sharp point. “Having regard
to the size of the monument, a platform of three metres
square would have been a more pointed extremity than that
which terminates the obelisks” (Letronne).
In the interior every device had been employed to conceal the exact
position of the sarcophagus, and to discourage the excavators whom
chance or persistent search might have put upon the right track. Their
first difficulty would be to discover the entrance under the limestone
casing. It lay hidden almost in the middle of the northern face, on
the level of the eighteenth course, at about forty-five feet above the
ground. A movable flagstone, working on a stone pivot, disguised it so
effectively that no one except the priests and custodians could have
distinguished this stone from its neighbours. When it was tilted up, a
yawning passage was revealed,* three and a half feet in height, with a
breadth of four feet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account