History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)Taine, Hippolyte
History
History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)
Taine, Hippolyte
English literature -- History and criticism
Rembrandt alone has beheld these sombre visions drowned in shade,
traversed by mystic rays: look, for example, at the church which he has
painted; glance at the mysterious floating apparition, full of radiant
forms, which he has set in the summit of the heavens, above the stormy
night and the terror which shakes mortality.[330] The two imaginations
have the same painful grandeur, the same scintillations, the same agony,
and both sink with like facility into triviality and crudeness. No
ulcer, no filth, is repulsive enough to disgust Carlyle. On occasion he
will compare the politician who seeks popularity to "the dog that was
drowned last summer, and that floats up and down the Thames with ebb and
flood.... You get to know him by sight... with a painful oppression of
nose.... Daily you may see him,... and daily the odour of him is getting
more intolerable."[331] Absurdities, incongruities, abound in his style.
When the frivolous Cardinal de Loménie proposed to convoke a Plenary
Court, he compares him to "trained canary birds, that would fly
cheerfully with lighted matches and fire cannon; fire whole powder
magazines."[332] At need, he turns to funny images. He ends a dithyramb
with a caricature: he bespatters magnificence with eccentric and coarse
language: he couples poetry with puns:
"The Genius of England no longer soars Sunward, world defiant, like an
Eagle through the storms, 'mewing her mighty youth,' as John Milton saw
her do: the Genius of England, much liker a greedy Ostrich intent on
provender and a whole skin mainly, stands with its other extremity
Sunward; with its Ostrich-head stuck into the readiest bush, of old
Church-tippets, King-cloaks, or what other 'sheltering Fallacy' there
may be, and so awaits the issue. The issue has been slow; but it is now
seen to have been inevitable. No Ostrich, intent on gross terrene
provender, and sticking its head into Fallacies, but will be awakened
one day--in a terrible _à-posteriori_ manner, if not otherwise?"[333]
With such buffoonery he concludes his best book, never quitting his tone
of gravity and gloom, in the midst of anathemas and prophecies. He needs
these great shocks. He cannot remain quiet, or stick to one literary
province at a time. He leaps in unimpeded jerks from one end of the
field of ideas to the other; he confounds all styles, jumbles all forms,
heaps together pagan allusions, Bible reminiscences, German
abstractions, technical terms, poetry, slang, mathematics, physiology,
archaic words, neologies. There is nothing he does not tread down and
ravage. The symmetrical constructions of human art and thought,
dispersed and upset, are piled under his hands into a vast mass of
shapeless ruins, from the top of which he gesticulates and fights, like
a conquering savage.
Section II.--The Humor of Carlyle
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account