History of European Morals From Augustus to Charlemagne (Vol. 1 of 2)Lecky, William Edward Hartpole
Philosophy
History of European Morals From Augustus to Charlemagne (Vol. 1 of 2)
Lecky, William Edward Hartpole
Ethics; Europe -- Moral conditions
16 “All pleasure is necessarily self-regarding, for it is impossible to
have any feelings out of our own mind. But there are modes of
delight that bring also satisfaction to others, from the round that
they take in their course. Such are the pleasures of benevolence.
Others imply no participation by any second party, as, for example,
eating, drinking, bodily warmth, property, and power; while a third
class are fed by the pains and privations of fellow-beings, as the
delights of sport and tyranny. The condemnatory phrase, selfishness,
applies with especial emphasis to the last-mentioned class, and, in
a qualified degree, to the second group; while such terms as
unselfishness, disinterestedness, self-devotion, are applied to the
vicarious position wherein we seek our own satisfaction in that of
others.”—Bain _On the Emotions and Will_, p. 113.
17 “Vice may be defined to be a miscalculation of chances, a mistake in
estimating the value of pleasures and pains. It is false moral
arithmetic.”—Bentham’s _Deontology_, vol. i. p. 131.
18 “La récompense, la punition, la gloire et l’infamie soumises à ses
volontés sont quatre espèces de divinités avec lesquelles le
législateur peut toujours opérer le bien public et créer des hommes
illustres en tous les genres. Toute l’étude des moralistes consiste
à déterminer l’usage qu’on doit faire de ces récompenses et de ces
punitions et les secours qu’on peut tirer pour lier l’intérêt
personnel à l’intérêt général.”—Helvétius _De l’Esprit_, ii. 22. “La
justice de nos jugements et de nos actions n’est jamais que la
rencontre heureuse de notre intérêt avec l’intérêt public.”—Ibid.
ii. 7. “To prove that the immoral action is a miscalculation of
self-interest, to show how erroneous an estimate the vicious man
makes of pains and pleasures, is the purpose of the intelligent
moralist. Unless he can do this he does nothing; for, as has been
stated above, for a man not to pursue what he deems likely to
produce to him the greatest sum of enjoyment, is, in the very nature
of things, impossible.”—Bentham’s _Deontology_.
19 “If the effect of virtue were to prevent or destroy more pleasure
than it produced, or to produce more pain than it prevented, its
more appropriate name would be wickedness and folly; wickedness as
it affected others, folly as respected him who practised
it.”—Bentham’s _Deontology_, vol. i. p. 142. “Weigh pains, weigh
pleasures, and as the balance stands will stand the question of
right and wrong.”—Ibid. vol. i. p. 137. “Moralis philosophiæ caput
est, Faustine fili, ut scias quibus ad beatam vitam perveniri
rationibus possit.”—Apuleius, _Ad Doct. Platonis_, ii. “Atque ipsa
utilitas, justi prope mater et æqui.”—Horace, _Sat._ I. iii. 98.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account