Ogygês is said to have reigned in Attica[458] 1020 years before the
first Olympiad, or 1796 years B. C. In his time happened the deluge
of Deukaliôn, which destroyed most of the inhabitants of the country:
after a long interval, Kekrops, an indigenous person, half man and
half serpent, is given to us by Apollodôrus as the first king of the
country: he bestowed upon the land, which had before been called
Actê, the name of Kekropia. In his day there ensued a dispute between
Athênê and Poseidôn respecting the possession of the acropolis at
Athens, which each of them coveted. First, Poseidôn struck the rock
with his trident, and produced the well of salt water which existed
in it, called the Erechthêis: next came Athênê, who planted the
sacred olive-tree ever afterwards seen and venerated in the portion
of Erechtheion called the cell of Pandrosus. The twelve gods decided
the dispute; and Kekrops having testified before them that Athênê
had rendered this inestimable service, they adjudged the spot to
her in preference to Poseidôn. Both the ancient olive-tree and the
well produced by Poseidôn were seen on the acropolis, in the temple
consecrated jointly to Athênê and Erechtheus, throughout the historical
ages. Poseidôn, as a mark of his wrath for the preference given to
Athênê, inundated the Thriasian plain with water.[459]
[458] Hellanikus, Fragm. 62; Philochor. Fragm. 8, ap. Euseb.
Præp. Evang. x. 10. p. 489. Larcher (Chronologie d’Hérodote, ch.
ix. s. 1. p. 278) treats both the historical personality and the
date of Ogygês as perfectly well authenticated.
It is not probable that Philochorus should have given any
calculation of time having reference to Olympiads; and hardly
conceivable that Hellanikus should have done so. Justin Martyr
quotes Hellanikus and Philochorus as having mentioned Moses,—ὡς
σφόδρα ἀρχαίου καὶ παλαιοῦ τῶν Ἰουδαίων ἄρχοντος Μωϋσέως
μέμνηνται—which is still more incredible even than the assertion
of Eusebius about their having fixed the date of Ogygês by
Olympiads (see Philochor. Fragm. 9).
[459] Apollod. iii. 14, 1; Herodot. viii. 55; Ovid. Metam. vi.
72. The story current among the Athenians represented Kekrops as
the judge of this controversy (Xenoph. Memor. iii. 5, 10).
The impressions of the trident of Poseidôn were still shown
upon the rock in the time of Pausanias (Pausan. i. 26, 4). For
the sanctity of the ancient olive-tree, see the narrative of
Herodotus (_l. c._), relating what happened to it when Xerxes
occupied the acropolis. As this tale seems to have attached
itself specially to the local peculiarities of the Erechtheion,
the part which Poseidôn plays in it is somewhat mean: that god
appears to greater advantage in the neighborhood of the Ἱπποτὴς
Κολωνὸς, as described in the beautiful Chorus of Sophoklês (Œdip.
Colon. 690-712).
A curious rationalization of the monstrous form ascribed to
Kekrops διφυὴς in Plutarch (Sera Num. Vindict. p. 551).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account