What the _electrum_ named in the Homeric poems really is cannot
be positively determined. The word in antiquity meant two
different things: 1, amber; 2, an impure gold, containing as
much as one-fifth or more of silver (Pliny, H. N. xxxiii. 4).
The passages in which we read the word in the Odyssey do not
positively exclude either of these meanings; but they present to
us electrum so much in juxtaposition with gold and silver each
separately, that perhaps the second meaning is more probable than
the first. Herodotus understands it to mean _amber_ (iii. 115):
Sophoklês, on the contrary, employs it to designate a metal akin
to gold (Antigone, 1033).
See the dissertation of Buttmann, appended to his collection of
essays called _Mythologus_, vol. ii. p. 337; also, Beckmann,
History of Inventions, vol. iv. p. 12, Engl. Transl. “The
ancients (observes the latter) used as a peculiar metal a mixture
of gold and silver, because they were not acquainted with the
art of separating them, and gave it the name of _electrum_.”
Dr. Thirlwall (Hist. of Greece, vol. i. p. 241) thinks that the
Homeric _electrum_ is amber; on the contrary, Hüllmann thinks
that it was a metallic substance (Handels, Geschichte der
Griechen, pp. 63-81).
Beckmann doubts whether the oldest κασσίτερος of the Greeks was
really _tin_: he rather thinks that it was “the _stannum_ of the
Romans, the _werk_ of our smelting-houses,—that is, a mixture of
lead, silver, and other accidental metals.” (_Ibid._ p. 20). The
Greeks of Massalia procured tin from Britain, through Gaul, by
the Seine, the Saone, and the Rhone (Diodôr. v. 22).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account