Heyne, in his comment, asks the question, not unnaturally,
“Pœnituerat igitur asperitatis erga priorem legationem, an homo
arrogans expectaverat alteram ad se missam iri?” I answer,
neither one nor the other: the words imply that he had received
_no embassy_ at all. He is still the same Achilles who in the
first book paced alone by the seashore, devouring his own soul
under a sense of bitter affront, and praying to Thetis to aid
his revenge: this revenge is now about to be realized, and he
hails its approach with delight. But if we admit the embassy
of the ninth book to intervene, the passage becomes a glaring
inconsistency for that which Achilles anticipates as future,
and even yet as contingent, _had actually occurred_ on the
previous evening; the Greeks _had_ supplicated at his feet,—they
_had proclaimed_ their intolerable need,—and he had spurned
them. The Scholiast, in his explanation of these lines, after
giving the plain meaning, that “Achilles shows what he has long
been desiring, to see the Greeks in a state of supplication
to him,”—seems to recollect that this is in contradiction to
the ninth book, and tries to remove the contradiction, by
saying “that he had been previously mollified by conversation
with Phœnix,”—ἤδη δὲ προμαλαχθεὶς ἦν ἐκ τῶν Φοίνικος λόγων,—a
supposition neither countenanced by anything in the poet, nor
sufficient to remove the difficulty.
2. The speech of Poseidôn (xiii. 115) to encourage the dispirited
Grecian heroes, in which, after having admitted the injury done
to Achilles by Agamemnôn, he recommends an effort to heal the
sore, and intimates “that the minds of good men admit of this
healing process,” (Ἀλλ᾽ ἀκεώμεθα θᾶσσον· ἀκεσταί τε φρένες
ἐσθλῶν,) is certainly not very consistent with the supposition
that this attempt to heal _had been made_ in the best possible
way, and that Achilles had manifested a mind implacable in the
extreme on the evening before,—while the mind of Agamemnôn was
already brought to proclaimed humiliation, and needed no farther
healing.
3. And what shall we say to the language of Achilles and
Patroclus, at the beginning of the sixteenth book, just at the
moment when the danger has reached its maximum, and when Achilles
is about to send forth his friend?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account