spoken at length, belongs to a different vein of conception, and
seems to me more likely to have emanated from a separate composer.
[307] The latter portion of the seventh book is spoiled by
the very unsatisfactory addition introduced to explain the
construction of the wall and ditch: all the other incidents (the
agora and embassy of the Trojans, the truce for burial, the
arrival of wine-ships from Lemnos, etc.) suit perfectly with
the scheme of the poet of these books, to depict the Trojan war
generally.
[308] Unless, indeed, we are to imagine the combat between
Tlepolemus and Sarpêdon, and that between Glaukus and Diomêdês,
to be separate songs; and they are among the very few passages
in the Iliad which are completely separable, implying no special
antecedents.
[309] Compare also Heyne, Excursus ii. sect. ii. ad Iliad. xxiv.
vol. viii. p. 783.
[310] Subsequent poets, seemingly thinking that the naked story,
(of Diomêdês slaughtering Rhêsus and his companions in their
sleep,) as it now stands in the Iliad, was too displeasing,
adopted different ways of dressing it up. Thus, according to
Pindar (ap. Schol. Iliad. x. 435), Rhêsus fought one day as the
ally of Troy, and did such terrific damage, that the Greeks
had no other means of averting total destruction from his hand
on the next day, except by killing him during the night. And
the Euripidean drama, called _Rhêsus_, though representing the
latter as a new-comer, yet puts into the mouth of Athênê the like
overwhelming predictions of what he would do on the coming day,
if suffered to live; so that to kill him in the night is the only
way of saving the Greeks (Eurip. Rhês. 602): moreover, Rhêsus
himself is there brought forward as talking with such overweening
insolence, that the sympathies of man, and the envy of the gods,
are turned against him (_ib._ 458).
But the story is best known in the form and with the addition
(equally unknown to the Iliad) which Virgil has adopted. It was
decreed by fate that, if the splendid horses of Rhêsus were
permitted once either to taste the Trojan provender, or to drink
of the river Xanthus, nothing could preserve the Greeks from ruin
(Æneid, i. 468, with Servius, _ad loc._):—
“Nec procul hinc Rhesi niveis tentoria velis
Agnoscit lacrymans: primo quæ prodita somno
Tydides multâ vastabat cæde cruentus:
Ardentesque avertit equos in castra, priusquam
Pabula gustassent Trojæ, Xanthumque bibissent.”
All these versions are certainly improvements upon the story as
it stands in the Iliad.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account