Menelaus is about to spare the life of the Trojan Adrastus, who
clasps his knees and craves mercy, offering a large ransom,—when
Agamemnôn repels the idea of quarter, and kills Adrastus with his
own hand: his speech to Menelaus displays the extreme of violent
enmity, yet the poet says,—
Ὣς εἰπὼν, παρέπεισεν ἀδελφείου φρένας ἥρως,
~Αἴσιμα παρειπὼν~, etc.
Adrastus is not called an ἱκέτης, nor is the expression used in
respect to Dolon (Il. x. 456), nor in the equally striking case
of Odysseus (Odyss. xiv. 279), when begging for his life.
There are in the legendary narratives abundant examples of
individuals who transgress in particular acts even the holiest of
these personal ties, but the savage Cyclops is the only person
described as professedly indifferent to them, and careless of that
sanction of the gods which in Grecian belief accompanied them
all.[143] In fact, the tragical horror which pervades the lineage
of Athamas or Kadmus, and which attaches to many of the acts of
Hêraklês, of Pêleus and Telamon, of Jasôn and Mêdea, of Atreus and
Thyestês, etc., is founded upon a deep feeling and sympathy with
those special obligations, which conspicuous individuals, under the
temporary stimulus of the maddening Atê, are driven to violate.
In such conflict of sentiments, between the obligation generally
reverenced and the exceptional deviation in an individual otherwise
admired, consists the pathos of the story.
[143] Odyss. ix. 112-275.
These feelings—of mutual devotion between kinsmen and companions
in arms—of generous hospitality to the stranger, and of helping
protection to the suppliant,—constitute the bright spots in a dark
age. We find them very generally prevalent amongst communities
essentially rude and barbarous,—amongst the ancient Germans as
described by Tacitus, the Druses in Lebanon,[144] the Arabian tribes
in the desert, and even the North American Indians.
[144] Tacit. German. c. 21. “Quemeunque mortalium arcere tecto,
nefas habetur: pro fortunâ quisque apparatis epulis excipit: cum
defecêre qui modo hospes fuerat, monstratur hospitii et comes,
proximam domum non invitati adeunt: nec interest—pari humanitate
accipiuntur. Notum ignotumque, quantum ad jus hospitii, nemo
discernit.” Compare Cæsar, B. G. vi. 22.
See about the Druses and Arabians, Volney, Travels in Egypt and
Syria, vol. ii. p. 76, Engl. Transl.; Niebuhr, Beschreibung von
Arabien, Copenh. 1772, pp. 46-49.
Pomponius Mela describes the ancient Germans in language not
inapplicable to the Homeric Greeks: “Jus in viribus habent,
adeo ut ne latrocinii quidem pudeat: _tantum_ hospitibus boni,
mitesque supplicibus.” (iii. 3.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account