The people called Assyrians or Syrians—for among the Greek authors
no constant distinction is maintained between the two[552]— were
distributed over the wide territory bounded on the east by Mount
Zagros and its north-westerly continuation toward Mount Ararat, by
which they were separated from the Medes,—and extending from thence
westward and southward to the Euxine sea, the river Halys, the
Mediterranean sea, and the Persian gulf,—thus covering the whole
course of the Tigris and Euphrates south of Armenia, as well as Syria
and Syria-Palæstine, and the territory eastward of the Halys called
Kappadokia. But the Chaldæan order of priests appear to have been
peculiar to Babylon and other towns in its territory, especially
between that city and the Persian gulf. The vast, rich, and lofty
temple of Bêlus in that city, served them at once as a place of
worship and an astronomical observatory; and it was the paramount
ascendency of this order which seems to have caused the Babylonian
people generally to be spoken of as Chaldæans,—though some writers
have supposed, without any good proof, a conquest of Assyrian
Babylon by barbarians called Chaldæans from the mountains near the
Euxine.[553]
[552] Herodot. i, 72; iii, 90-91; vii, 63; Strabo, xvi, p. 736,
also ii, p. 84, in which he takes exception to the distribution
of the οἰκουμένη (inhabited portion of the globe) made by
Eratosthenês, because it did not include in the same compartment
(σφραγὶς) Syria proper and Mesopotamia: he calls Ninus and
Semiramis, Syrians. Herodotus considers the Armenians as
colonists from the Phrygians (vii, 73).
The Homeric names Ἀρίμοι, Ἐρεμβοὶ (the first in the Iliad,
ii, 783, the second in the Odyssey, iv, 84) coincide with the
Oriental name of this race _Aram_; it seems more ancient, in the
Greek habits of speech, than _Syrians_ (see Strabo, xvi, p. 785).
The Hesiodic Catalogue too, as well as Stêsichorus, recognized
_Arabus_ as the son of Hermês, by Throniê, daughter of Bêlus
(Hesiod, Fragm. 29, ed. Marktscheffel; Strabo, i, p. 42).
[553] Heeren, in his account of the Babylonians (Ideen über den
Verkehr der Alten Welt, part i, Abtheilung 2, p. 168), speaks of
this conquest of Babylon by Chaldæan barbarians from the northern
mountains as a certain fact, explaining the great development of
the Babylonian empire under Nabopolasar and Nebuchadnezzar from
630-580 B. C.; it was, he thinks, the new Chaldæan conquerors who
thus extended their dominion over Judæa and Phenicia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account