“If a man, kinless of paternal relatives, fight and slay a man,
then, if he have maternal relatives, let them pay a third of
the wēr: his guild-brethren a third part: for a third let him
flee. If he have no maternal relatives, let his guild-brethren
pay half: for half let him flee.... If a man kill a man thus
circumstanced, if he have no relatives, let half be paid to the
king, half to his guild-brethren.” (Thorpe, Ancient Laws and
Institutes of England, vol. i, pp. 79-81.) Again, in the same
work, Leges Henrici Primi, vol. i, p. 596, the ideas of the
kindred and the guild run together in the most intimate manner:
“Si quis hominem occidat,—Si eum tunc _cognatio sua_ deserat, et
pro eo _gildare_ nolit,” etc. In the Salic law, the members of a
_contubernium_ were invested with the same rights and obligations
one towards the other (Rogge, Gerichtswesen der Germanen, ch.
iii, p. 62). Compare Wilda, Deutsches Strafrecht, p. 389, and the
valuable special treatise of the same author (Das Gildenwesen
im Mittelalter. Berlin, 1831), where the origin and progress
of the guilds from the primitive times of German heathenism is
unfolded. He shows that these associations have their basis
in the earliest feelings and habits of the Teutonic race,—the
family was, as it were, a natural guild,—the guild, a factitious
family. Common religious sacrifices and festivals,—mutual defence
and help, as well as mutual responsibility,—were the recognized
bonds among the _congildones_: they were _sororitates_ as well as
_fraternitates_, comprehending both men and women (deren Genosser
wie die Glieder einer Familie enge unter einander verbunden
waren, p. 145). Wilda explains how this primitive social and
religious _phratry_ (sometimes this very expression _fratria_ is
used, see p. 109) passed into something like the more political
tribe, or _phylê_ (see pp. 43, 57, 60, 116, 126, 129, 344). The
sworn _commune_, which spread so much throughout Europe in the
beginning of the twelfth century, partakes both of the one and of
the other,—_conjuratio_,—_amicitia jurata_ (pp. 148, 169).
The members of an Albanian _phara_ are all jointly bound to
exact, and each severally exposed to suffer, the vengeance of
blood, in the event of homicide committed upon, or by, any one of
them (Boué, _ut supra_).
[94] See the valuable chapter of Niebuhr, Röm. Gesch. vol. i, pp.
317, 350, 2d edit.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account