Justin gives a narrative of an analogous application from the
Epizephyrian Lokrians to Sparta (xx, 3): “Territi Locrenses
ad Spartanos decurrunt: auxilium supplices deprecantur: illi
longinquâ militiâ gravati, auxilium a Castore et Polluce petere
eos jubent. Neque legati responsum sociæ urbis spreverunt;
profectique in proximum templum, facto sacrificio, auxilium
deorum implorant. Litatis hostiis, _obtentoque, ut rebantur,
quod petebant—haud secus læti quam si deos ipsos secum avecturi
essent_—pulvinaria iis in navi componunt, faustisque profecti
ominibus, _solatia suis pro auxiliis_ deportant.” In comparing
the expressions of Herodotus with those of Justin, we see that
the former believes the direct literal presence and action of the
Æakid heroes (“the Thebans sent back the heroes, and asked for
men”), while the latter explains away the divine intervention
into a mere fancy and feeling on the part of those to whom it is
supposed to be accorded. This was the tone of those later authors
whom Justin followed: compare also Pausan. iii, 19, 2.
[302] Herodot. v, 81-82.
This remarkable embassy first brings us into acquaintance with the
Dorians of Ægina,—oligarchical, wealthy, commercial, and powerful
at sea, even in the earliest days; more analogous to Corinth than
to any of the other cities called Dorian. The hostility which they
now began without provocation against Athens,—repressed by Sparta at
the critical moment of the battle of Marathon,—then again breaking
out,—and hushed for a while by the common dangers of the Persian
invasion under Xerxês, was appeased only with the conquest of the
island about twenty years after that event, and with the expulsion
and destruction of its inhabitants some years later. There had been
indeed, according to Herodotus,[303] a feud of great antiquity
between Athens and Ægina,—of which he gives the account in a singular
narrative, blending together religion, politics, exposition of
ancient customs, etc.; but at the time when the Thebans solicited
aid from Ægina, the latter was at peace with Athens. The Æginetans
employed their fleet, powerful for that day, in ravaging Phalêrum
and the maritime demes of Attica; nor had the Athenians as yet any
fleet to resist them.[304] It is probable that the desired effect was
produced, of diverting a portion of the Athenian force from the war
against Bœotia, and thus partially relieving Thebes. But the war of
Athens against both of them continued for a considerable time, though
we have no information respecting its details.
[303] Herodot. v, 83-88.
[304] Herodot. v, 81-89. μεγάλως Ἀθηναίους ἐσινέοντο.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account