How very imperfectly the chronology of the poetical names even
of the sixth century B. C.—Sappho, Anakreon, Hippônax—was known
even to writers of the beginning of the Ptolemaic age (or
shortly after 300 B. C.), we may see by the mistakes noted in
Athenæus, xiii, p. 599. Hermesianax of Kolophon, the elegiac
poet, represented Anakreon as the lover of Sappho; this might
perhaps be not absolutely impossible, if we supposed in Sappho an
old age like that of Ninon de l’Enclos; but others (even earlier
than Hermesianax, since they are quoted by Chamæleon) represented
Anakreon, when in old age, as addressing verses to Sappho,
still young. Again, the comic writer Diphilus introduced both
Archilochus and Hippônax as the lovers of Sappho.
To a certain extent there seems to have been a real connection
between the two: new forms were essential for the expression of
new wants and feelings,—though the assertion that elegiac metre is
especially adapted for one set of feelings,[148] trochaic for a
second, and iambic for a third, if true at all, can only be admitted
with great latitude of exception, when we find so many of them
employed by the poets for very different subjects,—gay or melancholy,
bitter or complaining, earnest or sprightly,—seemingly with little
discrimination.
[148] The Latin poets and the Alexandrine critics seem to have
both insisted on the natural mournfulness of the elegiac metre
(Ovid, Heroid. xv, 7; Horat. Art. Poet. 75): see also the
fanciful explanation given by Didymus in the Etymologicon Magnum,
v. Ἔλεγος.
We learn from Hephæstion (c. viii, p. 45, Gaisf.) that the
anapæstic march-metre of Tyrtæus was employed by the comic
writers also, for a totally different vein of feeling. See the
Dissertation of Franck, Callinus, pp. 37-48 (Leips. 1816).
Of the remarks made by O. Müller respecting the metres of these
early poets (History of the Literature of Ancient Greece, ch.
xi, s. 8-12, etc.; ch. xii, s. 1-2, etc.), many appear to be
uncertified and disputable.
For some good remarks on the fallibility of men’s impressions
respecting the natural and inherent ἦθος of particular metres,
see Adam Smith (Theory of Moral Sentiment, part v, ch. i, p.
329), in the edition of his works by Dugald Stewart.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account