Thus perished Leonidas with his heroic comrades,—three hundred
Spartans and seven hundred Thespians. Amidst such equal heroism,
it seemed difficult to single out any individual as distinguished:
nevertheless, Herodotus mentions the Spartans Diênekês, Alpheus, and
Maron,—and the Thespian Dithyrambus,—as standing preëminent. The
reply ascribed to the first became renowned.[178] “The Persian host
(he was informed) is so prodigious that their arrows conceal the
sun.” “So much the better (he answered), we shall then fight them
in the shade.” Herodotus had asked and learned the name of every
individual among this memorable three hundred, and even six hundred
years afterwards, Pausanias could still read the names engraved on
a column at Sparta.[179] One alone among them—Aristodêmus—returned
home, having taken no part in the combat. He, together with Eurytus,
another soldier, had been absent from the detachment on leave, and
both were lying at Alpêni, suffering from a severe complaint in the
eyes. Eurytus, apprized that the fatal hour of the detachment was
come, determined not to survive it, asked for his armor, and desired
his attendant Helot to lead him to his place in the ranks; where
he fell gallantly fighting, while the Helot departed and survived.
Aristodêmus did not imitate this devotion of his sick comrade:
overpowered with physical suffering, he was carried to Sparta—but he
returned only to scorn and infamy among his fellow-citizens.[180]
He was denounced as “the coward Aristodêmus;” no one would speak or
communicate with him, or even grant him a light for his fire.[181]
After a year of such bitter disgrace, he was at length enabled to
retrieve his honor at the battle of Platæa, where he was slain, after
surpassing all his comrades in heroic and even reckless valor.
[178] Herodot. vii, 226.
[179] Herodot. vii, 224. ἐπυθόμην δὲ καὶ ἁπάντων τῶν τριακοσίων.
Pausanias, iii, 14, 1. Annual festivals, with a panegyrical
oration and gymnastic matches, were still celebrated even in
his time in honor of Leonidas, jointly with Pausanias, whose
subsequent treason tarnished his laurels acquired at Platæa.
It is remarkable, and not altogether creditable to Spartan
sentiment, that the two kings should have been made partners in
the same public honors.
[180] Herod. vii, 229. Ἀριστόδημον—λειποψυχέοντα
λειφθῆναι—ἀλγήσαντα ἀπονοστῆσαι ἐς Σπάρτην. The commentators
are hard upon Aristodêmus when they translate these epithets,
“animo deficientem, timidum, pusillanimum,” considering that
ἐλειποψύχησε is predicated by Thucydides (iv, 12) even respecting
the gallant Brasidas. Herodotus scarcely intends to imply
anything like pusillanimity, but rather the effect of extreme
physical suffering. It seems, however, that there were different
stories about the cause which had kept Aristodêmus out of the
battle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account