Mardonius, though master of Athens, was so anxious to conciliate
the Athenians, that he at first abstained from damaging either the
city or the country, and despatched a second envoy to Salamis to
repeat the offers made through Alexander of Macedon: he thought that
they might now be listened to, since he could offer the exemption
of Attica from ravage, as an additional temptation. Murychidês, a
Hellespontine Greek, was sent to renew these propositions to the
Athenian senate at Salamis; but he experienced a refusal not less
resolute than that of Alexander of Macedon when sent to Athens,
and all but unanimous. One unfortunate senator, Lykidas, made an
exception to this unanimity, and ventured to recommend acceptance
of the propositions of Murychidês. So furious was the wrath, or so
strong the suspicion of corruption, which his single-voiced negative
provoked, that senators and people both combined to stone him to
death: while the Athenian women in Salamis, hearing what had passed,
went of their own accord to the house of Lykidas, and stoned to death
his wife and children. In the desperate pitch of resolution to which
the Athenians were now wound up, an opponent passed for a traitor:
unanimity, even though extorted by terror, was essential to their
feelings.[311] Murychidês, though his propositions were refused, was
dismissed without injury.
[311] Herodot. ix, 5. I dare not reject this story about Lykidas
(see Lykurgus cont. Leokrat. c. 30, p. 222), though other authors
recount the same incident as having happened to a person named
Kyrsilus, during the preceding year, when the Athenians quitted
Athens: see Demosthen. de Coronâ, p. 296, c. 59; and Cicero de
Officiis, iii, 11. That two such acts were perpetrated by the
Athenians, is noway probable: and if we are to choose between
the two, the story of Herodotus is far the more probable. In the
migration of the preceding year, we know that a certain number of
Athenians actually did stay behind in the acropolis, and Kyrsilus
might have been among them, if he had chosen. Moreover, Xerxes
held out no offers, and gave occasion to no deliberation; while
the offers of Mardonius might really appear to a well-minded
citizen deserving of attention.
Isokrates (Or. iv, Panegyric. p. 74, c. 42) states that the
Athenians condemned many persons to death for _medism_ (in
allusion doubtless to Themistoklês as one), but he adds,—“even
now they imprecate curses on any citizen who enters into amicable
negotiation with the Persians,”—ἐν δὲ τοῖς συλλόγοις ἔτι καὶ νῦν
ἀρὰς ποιοῦνται, εἴτις ἐπικηρυκεύεται Πέρσαις τῶν πολιτῶν. It
is difficult to believe that in his time any such imprecation
can have been included in the solemnities whereby the Athenian
meetings were opened.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account